Policy 6 - Single organizations with multiple aggregation poi nts

Bill Darte billd at cait.wustl.edu
Thu Nov 1 14:13:29 EST 2001


I like this wording better too, because the onus should not be on ARIN staff
to identify and recommend one relationship over another.
bd

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Dul [mailto:andrew at internap.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 12:29 PM
To: David R Huberman
Cc: Sweeting, John; ppml at arin.net
Subject: RE: Policy 6 - Single organizations with multiple aggregation
poi nts



On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, David R Huberman wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> > I believe the point was that not every organization that currently has
> > multiple maintainer accounts would want to fall under this policy so in
> > order for them to have this new policy apply to them, they would ahve to
> > request it.


That indeed was the intent.  I was trying to clarify that groups that
wanted to use this needed to ask and that this would not 'applied' without
a group requesting it.


>
> Then if the language is intended for organizations currently managing
> multiple maintainers, shouldn't we just say something like:
>
> * Current members presently managing multiple maintainer accounts
> should contact the ARIN Hostmaster if they wish for this policy
> to apply to one or more of their current accounts.
>
> Just a suggestion
> /david
>
>

I like this new language.



More information about the ARIN-PPML mailing list