Just to clarify
shane at ripe.net
Thu Jan 4 10:12:20 EST 2001
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, ginny listman wrote:
> Apparently, there have been some upstream ISPs that have assigned some
> networks via SWIP, where later the downstream comes back saying it
> should have been an allocation, ie they want a maintainer id so they
> can assign/allocate further on down.
> Many times, it is just a minor error in the SWIP template, and
> shouldn't be a big deal. However, would there ever be a situation
> where the upstream would not want the downstream to be
> assigning/allocating? Should ARIN be responsible for notifying the
> upstream? We have be processing these request because we do not want
> to delay the downstream's business. Do we need a written policy to
> define how we should be processing such a request?
Question: Can the ISP that received the parent block modify/delete the
blocks allocated/assigned by its children?
In any case, in lieu of a genuine notification mechanism, I think ARIN
should send an e-mail to the upstream. I wouldn't think waiting approval
is necessary, as long as ARIN is willing to delete any records added by
the downstream if approval is denied.
More information about the ARIN-PPML