Status of Policy Proposal 2001-2?
jfleming at anet.com
Fri Dec 21 14:31:30 EST 2001
It all boils down to fairness.
Which list do you think is more fair ?
The "toy" IPv4 Internet Early Experimentation Allocations ?
The Proof-of-Concept IPv8 Allocations ?
Why would people pay for Address Space, when it is FREE ?
----- Original Message -----
From: "McBurnett, Jim" <jmcburnett at msmgmt.com>
To: "'Richard Jimmerson'" <richardj at arin.net>; <ddiller at cogentco.com>; <ppml at arin.net>
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:11 PM
Subject: RE: Status of Policy Proposal 2001-2?
> Now here are the questions I have:
> When and if this does get passed, and I am multihomed to 2 or 3 providers,
> can they refuse to grant the IP's? what recourse do I have?
> And how does/should this policy affect what an ISP can charge for a /24?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Jimmerson [mailto:richardj at arin.net]
> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 1:38 PM
> To: ddiller at cogentco.com; ppml at arin.net
> Subject: RE: Status of Policy Proposal 2001-2?
> Hello Dave,
> Thank you for your inquiry.
> There was consensus at the ARIN VIII meeting to accept
> Policy Proposal 2001-2. The ARIN Advisory Council has
> recommended to the ARIN Board of Trustees that this
> policy proposal be ratified.
> The ARIN Board of Trustees will make a final determination
> on this policy proposal during their January 2002 meeting.
> We will post new information regarding this policy proposal
> to the front page of arin.net under the announcements section
> as soon as it becomes available.
> Best Regards,
> Richard Jimmerson
> Director of Operations
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-ppml at arin.net [mailto:owner-ppml at arin.net] On
> > Behalf Of Dave Diller
> > Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 12:33 PM
> > To: ppml at arin.net
> > Subject: Status of Policy Proposal 2001-2?
> > I have been advised that "the right people to discuss this
> > with" are on
> > PPML itself, in response to sending the below query to ARIN.
> > Apparently, the people processing IP justifications don't
> > know if it is
> > a valid justification or not, which isn't a good sign. I'm trying to
> > get a handle on it BEFORE a customer comes spouting hearsay that the
> > Policy has in fact passed.
> > So, "right people", has this been voted on yet?
> > > I just read the archives for PPML concerning Policy Proposal 2001-2,
> > > thread located at http://www.arin.net/mailinglists/ppml/0401.html.
> > > There were some interesting comments, but it in no way
> > indicates which
> > > way the final vote went with the Trustees, which is the piece of
> > > information I am interested in. Has this policy been voted
> > on yet? If
> > > not, when will the Board of Trustees vote on it, and where will the
> > > results of that vote be posted?
> > >
> > > Last call for Policy 2001-2 ended at 11:59pm EST 11/23/01. At that
> > > point it was to be forwarded to the ARIN Board of Trustees.
> > There is no
> > > further word.
> > >
> > > I'd REALLY prefer to not give someone a /24 for multihoming
> > and only 20
> > > documented hosts until I know the Policy allows it.
> > -DaveD
More information about the ARIN-PPML