<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt">----- Original Message ----<br><div><div>> From: Michael Hasse <mhasse@itwerx.net><br>> To: arin-discuss@arin.net<br>> Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 1:45:03 AM<br>> Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] use of 128.66.0.0/16 not clear<br>> <br>> Or simply a usage audit of legacy /8s owned by such as duPont, Eli Lily, Ford, <br>> Merck et al. There's more than a few /8s out there that are likely pretty <br>> sparsely implemented. Not to mention ones that have been rolled into other <br>> orgs, e.g. ranges originally assigned to DEC, CSC and others. (How many /8s <br>> does a non-ISP need anyway? Hope I'm not speaking out of turn here...)<br><br>You're not out of turn at all! Participation is good!<br><br><div>What utilization threshold
is acceptable?
We don't have a policy covering <br>utilization, except when an organization requests additional address space.<br>
<br>btw, Board candidates were asked, "What do you feel ARIN’s appropriate role and relationship should be
with respect to legacy address space and the holders of legacy address
space?"<br>You might be interested in their (our) responses:<br><span><a target="_blank" href="https://www.arin.net/app/election/questionnaire/?elec_id=15">https://www.arin.net/app/election/questionnaire/?elec_id=15</a></span><br></div><br><span>Read bios, statements of support, and petitions at <a target="_blank" href="https://www.arin.net/app/election/">https://www.arin.net/app/election/</a></span><br><br><br>Lee<br><br></div></div></div><br>
</body></html>