<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7652.24">
<TITLE>RE: [arin-discuss] REMOVE</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>Evidence on point....<BR>
<BR>
Miguel wishes to be removed from this list...and this banter and the lack of constructive discussion is likely to do more harm in the future....<BR>
<BR>
Miguel, I ask you to reconsider your interest in being removed. Please give this list another chance.<BR>
<BR>
But, if later (or now if you must) want to be removed from the list, you must follow the instructions at:<BR>
<BR>
<A HREF="http://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/index.html">http://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/index.html</A><BR>
<BR>
Bill Darte<BR>
ARIN Advisory Council<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: arin-discuss-bounces@arin.net on behalf of Miguel Betancourt<BR>
Sent: Fri 11/9/2007 12:48 PM<BR>
To: Steve Bertrand; Paul Vixie<BR>
Cc: arin-discuss@arin.net<BR>
Subject: [arin-discuss] REMOVE<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
----- Original Message -----<BR>
From: "Steve Bertrand" <steve@ibctech.ca><BR>
To: "Paul Vixie" <paul@vix.com><BR>
Cc: <arin-discuss@arin.net><BR>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 10:39 AM<BR>
Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] Restricting postings to one per day and three<BR>
per week<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
>> i still don't like it. you'd essentially say that<BR>
>> anyone who wanted to be able to freely address<BR>
>> comments to arin's membership, also had to address<BR>
>> those comments to the public. ppml is a public<BR>
>> forum. i'm talking about an open membership forum,<BR>
>> which is what arin-discuss@ currently is.<BR>
><BR>
> Either that, or discussions would get extremely fragmented.<BR>
><BR>
> If a member felt they *needed* to reply a message and were over their<BR>
> quota, they would likely do a reply-all and remove the -discuss list.<BR>
><BR>
> This would most likely cause even more confusion and frustration than<BR>
> what is present now as nobody would be able to follow an entire thread<BR>
> in it's entirety.<BR>
><BR>
> I wouldn't even go as far as to say moderation would be better, as then<BR>
> you would have a governing body who at it's sole discretion could decide<BR>
> whether a member's comment was appropriate or not.<BR>
><BR>
> It's up to the members to decide whether another member's opinion is<BR>
> valid and appropriate. Everyone is entitled to voice their opinion, and<BR>
> limiting and/or blocking someones opinion would (IMHO) detract from the<BR>
> purpose of this list entirely.<BR>
><BR>
> Steve<BR>
> _______________________________________________<BR>
> ARIN-Discuss<BR>
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN<BR>
> Discussion<BR>
> Mailing List (ARIN-discuss@arin.net).<BR>
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<BR>
> <A HREF="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss</A> Please contact the<BR>
> ARIN Member<BR>
> Services Help Desk at info@arin.net if you experience any issues.<BR>
<BR>
_______________________________________________<BR>
ARIN-Discuss<BR>
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Discussion<BR>
Mailing List (ARIN-discuss@arin.net).<BR>
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:<BR>
<A HREF="http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss">http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss</A> Please contact the ARIN Member<BR>
Services Help Desk at info@arin.net if you experience any issues.<BR>
<BR>
E</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>