[arin-discuss] For legacy holders concerned about the RSA requirement for new ARIN IRR and RPKI

[Brian David]

+1 as well.

FCIX and ALTDB have been clutch for us as a tiny network operator. FCIX
documentation and support are super useful. I pinged Kenneth @ altdb & fcix
to see about the IRRd v4. 🤞

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:22 PM Rob Seastrom <rs at seastrom.com> wrote:

>
> +1
>
> > On Jul 23, 2020, at 2:13 PM, Job Snijders <job at ntt.net> wrote:
> >
> >> The FCIX whitepaper is quite well done and is a worthwhile read for
> >> anyone who’s emailing RPSL templates around regardless of where one is
> >> sending them.
> >
> > The FCIX whitepaper advises the use of 'MAIL FROM:' authentication for
> > the mntner object: ** this is NOT recommended ** and *not* a best
> > practise. Please use GPG or one of the hash-based authentication
> > methods.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Job
> >
> > ps. I would like to urge both RADB and ALTDB to upgrade to the free open
> > source & modern IRRd v4 product which brings many security advantages
> > for both the IRRd operator and IRRd user. http://irrd.net/
>
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-Discuss
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-discuss/attachments/20200723/9bf95250/attachment.htm>