[arin-discuss] [arin-ppml] Term Limit Proposal

[Martin Hannigan]

One additional caveat, it needs to include the ARIN ASO AC as well.

Best,

-M<




On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Martin Hannigan <hannigan at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> I support this.
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Steven Ryerse <
> SRyerse at eclipse-networks.com> wrote:
>
>>  I would support this.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *Steven Ryerse*
>>
>> *President*
>>
>> *100 Ashford Center North, Suite 110, Atlanta, GA  30338*
>>
>> *www.eclipse-networks.com <http://www.eclipse-networks.com>*
>>
>> *770.656.1460 - Cell*
>>
>> *770.399.9099- Office*
>>
>>
>>
>> [image: Description: Description: Eclipse Networks Logo_small.png]℠ Eclipse
>> Networks, Inc.
>>
>>         Conquering Complex Networks℠
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-ppml-bounces at arin.net] *On
>> Behalf Of *Azinger, Marla
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 25, 2014 12:06 PM
>> *To:* arin-ppml at arin.net; arin-discuss at arin.net
>> *Subject:* [arin-ppml] Term Limit Proposal
>>
>>
>>
>> Having been on the AC for a 6 years I support a term limit for the AC.
>>
>>
>>
>> When on my 4th year I pursued creating a term limit.  At the time I was
>> told this was an action the BOT would have to take.  No action was taken.
>> Later I inquired on this being submitted as policy since the BOT did not
>> take action.  I was told it would be thrown out since it’s not a matter of
>> policy.  Now with time and reviewing other public posts, I have more hope
>> this will be taken seriously and something done.  I include this small
>> history on my experience to show that the idea of term measures has been
>> around for a  while but for some reason never gained traction.
>>
>>
>>
>> I believe a balance between familiarity, hitting a productive stride,
>> burn out and mind melting needs to be balanced out with fresh able minds.
>> I also believe a solid 3 year break is needed for people to re-integrate as
>> a non-AC person and regroup.  Leaving anyone on a committee for more than 6
>> years opens the door to stagnation, burn out, and conformity of thinking.
>> Remember, just because someone is not on the AC any longer does not mean AC
>> folks can’t get advice from them if desired.
>>
>>
>>
>> *I propose the following be used for AC:*
>>
>> *-Keep the 3 year terms in place  and add *
>>
>> *-a 6 year contiguous term limit *
>>
>> *-a 3 year ineligibility year period after a term ends be it 3year or
>> 6years*
>>
>> *-After 3 year ineligibility is over a person my run for a position on
>> the AC again.*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> I believe the BOT should also have some term measures and limits.
>> However, I am asking someone who has served on the BOT in the past to
>> create a thought out term plan and propose it.
>>
>>
>>
>> To keep this topic on track, I have purposely excluded the discussion of
>> committee member candidate requirements.  This should be a separate topic
>> that also needs discussion in order to better ensure community wide
>> representation.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Marla Azinger
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-discuss/attachments/20140325/a89bf365/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1468 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-discuss/attachments/20140325/a89bf365/attachment.jpg>