[arin-discuss] [ARIN-Suggestions] New ACSP Suggestion 2014.10: CHANGES TO CANDIDATE SPEECHES
john at citylinkfiber.com
Fri Jun 6 12:19:19 EDT 2014
Candidates should speak about themselves and with permission of the
other candidate could speak to endorse another candidate.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:41 AM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> On Jun 6, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Rob Seastrom <rs at seastrom.com> wrote:
>>> The process doesn¹t appear to be broken. Just a few individuals and their
>>> use of it.
>> Actually, I disagree. I'm opposed to any suggestion that a candidate
>> ought to be restricted from talking about whatever he or she cares to
>> during their stump speech. The electorate is entirely capable of
>> deciding whether a candidate's remarks are appropriate and acting
> RS -
> (presuming that we continue with the present predominantly live
> candidate speeches)
> Should candidates be told to briefly state their own qualifications
> for consideration by the electorate? Or simply told that they've
> got 3 minutes, and "go for it?" If candidates want endorsers to
> also speak, should they be able/encouraged to enter them as candidates
> as well so they get a speaking slot?
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-discuss