[arin-discuss] [ARIN-Suggestions] New ACSP Suggestion 2014.10: CHANGES TO CANDIDATE SPEECHES

[John Brown]

Candidates should speak about themselves and with permission of the
other candidate could speak to endorse another candidate.



On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:41 AM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net> wrote:
> On Jun 6, 2014, at 11:26 AM, Rob Seastrom <rs at seastrom.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> The process doesn¹t appear to be broken.  Just a few individuals and their
>>> use of it.
>>
>> Actually, I disagree.  I'm opposed to any suggestion that a candidate
>> ought to be restricted from talking about whatever he or she cares to
>> during their stump speech.  The electorate is entirely capable of
>> deciding whether a candidate's remarks are appropriate and acting
>> accordingly.
>
> RS -
>
> (presuming that we continue with the present predominantly live
> candidate speeches)
>
> Should candidates be told to briefly state their own qualifications
> for consideration by the electorate?  Or simply told that they've
> got 3 minutes, and "go for it?"   If candidates want endorsers to
> also speak, should they be able/encouraged to enter them as candidates
> as well so they get a speaking slot?
>
> Thanks!
> /John
>
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> ARIN
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-Discuss
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.