[arin-discuss] ipv6 fees in new fee structure

[Alec Ginsberg]

I'd like to echo this point.

>>Sorry IPv6 BGP table, policy got in the way again!

We already have enough table bloat with the fragmentation of IPv4.

This is horrible that we have to make it worse, especially right now when it could be done the right way going into it.

________________________________________
From: arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net [arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Owen DeLong [owen at delong.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 5:28 PM
To: Joseph Conti
Cc: arin-discuss at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] ipv6 fees in new fee structure

I will point out that these are fees, not policy. The AC has no role in fees and they are set by fiat of the board rather than through the public policy process.

I am not thrilled with the new fee structure, either, especially since it does an end-run on expectations created in the early days of the LRSA.

Owen

On Mar 7, 2013, at 11:14 AM, Joseph Conti <joseph at media-hosts.com<mailto:joseph at media-hosts.com>> wrote:

As long as organisations have the option of re-numbering the financial incentive on ARIN's side of the table would just result in inconveniencing smaller organisations. The ones who want to save money and have an easy opportunity to re-number now, will do so.

4,096 /48's in a /36 is still a lot of space. If/when we fill that properly, we can just get another /36 at that point and save money between now and then.

Sorry IPv6 BGP table, policy got in the way again!

Joseph

On 13-03-07 01:47 PM, Ian McLaughlin wrote:

On 2013-03-07, at 10:43 AM, Alex Krohn <alex-arin at gossamer-threads.com><mailto:alex-arin at gossamer-threads.com> wrote:



it seems like 234 members who have x-small v4 and small v6 are faced
with being charged under small when they (probably) would have been just
as happy if their initial allocation was a /36 and thus stayed in
x-small.


Looked at another way, this is an additional $234K in revenue per year for ARIN per year.  Not insignificant. (Yes, we're one of the affected early-adopters.)

Ian McLaughlin
Director of Technology
Dargal Interline Worldwide
250-979-1161

_______________________________________________
ARIN-Discuss
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net<mailto:ARIN-discuss at arin.net>).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
Please contact info at arin.net<mailto:info at arin.net> if you experience any issues.



_______________________________________________
ARIN-Discuss
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net<mailto:ARIN-discuss at arin.net>).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.