[arin-discuss] IPv6 as justification for IPv4?
Michael Tague
tague at win.net
Fri Apr 19 18:22:44 EDT 2013
As a smaller ISP ($600k/yr revenue), I have always felt that ARIN's fees to
us feel very high. We currently pay $4500/yr and under the new fee
schedule would pay $4000 (though I see from this discussion that we may
qualify for $2000 because some of our IP space is legacy - TBD). That
means we are paying (currently) 0.75% of our annual revenue to ARIN.
Below I've expanded upon rcl at usfamily.net's table to include the Proposed
Fee Schedule as well as the Current one. I've also added percentage
columns for each which show how many percent more the Proposed or Current
fees are compared with the Linear ($8/Class-C).
As you can see the Proposed Fees are better than the Current one by about a
factor of two, but still, both are heavily weighted against smaller
providers and in favor of larger ones compared with the Linear scale.
Size Linear Proposed Current
---- -------- -------------- ---------------
/24 $8 $500 6150% $1,250 15525%
/23 $16 $500 3125% $1,250 7713%
/22 $32 $500 1463% $1,250 3806%
/21 $64 $1,000 1463% $1,250 1953%
/20 $128 $1,000 681% $2,250 1658%
/19 $256 $2,000 681% $2,250 779%
/18 $512 $2,000 291% $4,500 779%
/17 $1,024 $4,000 291% $4,500 339%
/16 $2,048 $4,000 95% $4,500 120%
/15 $4,096 $8,000 95% $9,000 120%
/14 $8,192 $8,000 -2% $9,000 10%
/13 $16,384 $16,000 -2% $18,000 10%
/12 $32,768 $16,000 -51% $18,000 -45%
/11 $65,536 $32,000 -51% $18,000 -73%
/10 $131,072 $32,000 -76% $18,000 -86%
/9 $262,144 $32,000 -88% $18,000 -93%
/8 $524,288 $32,000 -94% $18,000 -97%
A 16 Class-C ISP (/20) would pay $128 on the Linear scale, will pay $1,000
on the Proposed schedule and is paying $2,250 on the Current schedule.
It comes down to what one thinks is fair or what one is paying for?
Michael Tague
tague at win.net
More information about the ARIN-discuss
mailing list