[arin-discuss] tweak to proposed fee schedule

[John Curran]

On Apr 16, 2013, at 4:39 PM, Adam Greene <agreene at webjogger.net> wrote:

> John,
> 
> Thanks for your reply, I really appreciate it. 
> 
> I will have to sharpen my pencil to figure out if a /36 will be adequate.
> Based on http://www.ipbcop.org/ratified-bcops/bcop-ipv6-subnetting/, I
> assume so, but I have to wrap my head around the bit boundaries.

Acknowledged.

Note that there is also an ongoing policy discussion (Draft Policy 2013-3)
which would allow an ISP to opt to receive as small as an IPv6 /40 prefix,
and your thoughts (as well as everyone elses) as to whether this makes good
technical sense for any ISP would also be welcome input into the discussion 
which is taking place on the arin-ppml list regarding this policy proposal.  

> Thanks again. If I can find the time to participate, I will! 

Good to hear, and please do not hesitate to contact me if you
have any questions!

/John

John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN