[arin-discuss] IPv6 as justification for IPv4?

[Brian Jankovich]

I agree and doubt ARIN is really holding them to the 3mo justification of
these IP blocks they are procuring.

Brian Jankovich
President | vaultnetworks

305.735.8098 x210 | Brian.Jankovich at VaultNetworks.com
skype: brianvaultnet
www.vaultnetworks.com



-----Original Message-----
From: Jawaid Bazyar [mailto:Jawaid.Bazyar at forethought.net] 
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 3:07 PM
To: arin-discuss at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] IPv6 as justification for IPv4?

Still, it's a fact that the big players are hoarding immense, unused 
IPv4 space, which is why none of them care about IPv6.



On 04/15/2013 12:42 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2013, at 10:51 , rlc at usfamily.net wrote:
>
>> You ARE new to this.  If you had been around longer, you would have
realized
>> that large players run the show at ARIN.  Otherwise, the fees would have
been
>> proportional to the size of the netblocks on IPv4, at least since the
time that
>> people started to come to grips with the mathematics of IPv4.
>>
> I don't believe that for a second.
>
> I have been an active member of this community since before ARIN was
formed
> and have been active in the ARIN policy process since not long after it
was formed.
>

-- 

Jawaid Bazyar

President

ph 303.815.1814

fax 303.815.1001

Jawaid.Bazyar at foreThought.net <email:Jawaid.Bazyar at foreThought.net>
	<http://www.foreThought.net>
Note our new address: 2347 Curtis St, Denver CO 80205

_______________________________________________
ARIN-Discuss
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.