[arin-discuss] IPv6 as justification for IPv4?

Brian Jankovich bjankovich at vaultnetworks.com
Mon Apr 15 16:36:28 EDT 2013

I agree and doubt ARIN is really holding them to the 3mo justification of
these IP blocks they are procuring.

Brian Jankovich
President | vaultnetworks

305.735.8098 x210 | Brian.Jankovich at VaultNetworks.com
skype: brianvaultnet

-----Original Message-----
From: Jawaid Bazyar [mailto:Jawaid.Bazyar at forethought.net] 
Sent: Monday, April 15, 2013 3:07 PM
To: arin-discuss at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] IPv6 as justification for IPv4?

Still, it's a fact that the big players are hoarding immense, unused 
IPv4 space, which is why none of them care about IPv6.

On 04/15/2013 12:42 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2013, at 10:51 , rlc at usfamily.net wrote:
>> You ARE new to this.  If you had been around longer, you would have
>> that large players run the show at ARIN.  Otherwise, the fees would have
>> proportional to the size of the netblocks on IPv4, at least since the
time that
>> people started to come to grips with the mathematics of IPv4.
> I don't believe that for a second.
> I have been an active member of this community since before ARIN was
> and have been active in the ARIN policy process since not long after it
was formed.


Jawaid Bazyar


ph 303.815.1814

fax 303.815.1001

Jawaid.Bazyar at foreThought.net <email:Jawaid.Bazyar at foreThought.net>
Note our new address: 2347 Curtis St, Denver CO 80205

You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

More information about the ARIN-discuss mailing list