[arin-discuss] tweak to proposed fee schedule
jcurran at arin.net
Fri Apr 12 08:40:58 EDT 2013
On Apr 11, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>> Are you suggesting that they should not be allowed to request
>> a /36 IPv6 block at all, contrary to present policy? If so,
>> this should raised on the Public Policy mailing list (ppml)
>> for further discussion.
> If you take out the fee incentive to do so, I think the policy issue is largely moot.
It is very important to have a fee schedule which is "complete";
i.e. covers the entire range of possible address holdings. It is
also good for the Board to be clear regarding the corresponding
fee expectations for all ranges. The fee schedule should not be
constraining the community discussion in any manner, and it would
not be appropriate for the ARIN Board to use the fee schedule to
preempt discussion of policy, including the proposed change in
Draft Policy ARIN-2013-3 "Tiny IPv6 Allocations for ISPs"
The community should have the opportunity to consider the various
of aspects of any proposed policy, including any fairness or technical
concerns, and come to a conclusion regarding support or lack thereof.
President and CEO
More information about the ARIN-discuss