[arin-discuss] Size Categories for IPv6.
Owen DeLong
owen at delong.com
Mon Apr 18 16:35:32 EDT 2011
Andrew,
First, end sites receive assignments and not allocations.
Second, there are size categories for end sites:
From: https://www.arin.net/fees/fee_schedule.html
IPV6 END USER FEES
Size Category Fee (US Dollars) Block Size
X-small $1,250 smaller than /40
Small $2,250 /40 to /32
Medium $4,500 /31 to /30
Large $9,000 /29 to /27
X-large $18,000 /26 to /22
XX-large $36,000 /22 and larger
As you can see, your multiple /48s (up to 255 of them) can be issued together for a single
X-Small fee of $1,250.
Further, these are one-time fees when blocks are issued and your annual fee is $100.
The fees listed in the ISP table are annual subscription fees. Do you really want your end-user
fees increased that extensively?
Owen
On Apr 18, 2011, at 1:00 PM, Andrew Gallo wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I would agree this topic needs further discussion and hopefully policy
> improvement and implementation.
>
> These size assignments should not be just for ISPs. As an end site
> that, for various reasons, should have larger than a /48, we seem to be
> stuck with either multiple /48 allocations, or attempting to justify a
> /32. Ideally, there would be size categories between 48 & 32,
> especially for end sites that receive allocations directly from ARIN.
>
> Thank you.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 4/18/2011 3:54 PM, cja at daydream.com wrote:
>> There was a recent policy proposal (138) to try to change the size
>> categories for IPv6 allocations. It was abandoned by the AC because it is a
>> pricing matter but I wanted to start up a discussion here to perhaps give
>> ARIN guidance as to how the community feels about changing the sizes.
>>
>> Currently the IPv6 size categories are
>>
>> IPv6 Annual FeeS (NOTE: FEE WAIVERS IN EFFECT)Size CategoryFee (US
>> Dollars)Block
>> SizeX-small$1,250smaller than /40Small$2,250/40 to /32Medium$4,500/31 to /30
>> Large$9,000/29 to /27X-large$18,000/26 to /22XX-large$36,000/22 and largerThe
>> proposal was to change them as follows
>>
>> X-small /32 or smaller
>> Small /31 to /30
>> Medium /29 to /27
>> Large /26 to /24
>> X-large /23 to /20
>> XX-large /20 and larger
>>
>> Thanks!
>> ----Cathy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ARIN-Discuss
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
>> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
> - --
> ____________
> Andrew Gallo
> The George Washington University
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk2smHYACgkQQr/gMVyFYyTFXwCfdYagWQ9x+woozic6g5zJcprN
> dScAn2pEjJuHBtTDHqmI43Zaoo+KrXjq
> =c0cf
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-Discuss
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-discuss/attachments/20110418/79bd1053/attachment.html>
More information about the ARIN-discuss
mailing list