[arin-discuss] /20 initial allocation for single-homed server?

[Owen DeLong]

On May 21, 2010, at 9:29 AM, Randy McAnally wrote:

> ---------- Original Message -----------
> From: <michael.dillon at bt.com>
> To: <arin-discuss at arin.net>
> Sent: Fri, 21 May 2010 17:13:50 +0100
> Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] /20 initial allocation for single-homed server?
> 
>>> Therefore, it appears that the flaw in policy is that a traditional
>> ISP
>>> can't use this as justification while it can be used to get space
>> under
>>> the end-user policy.
>> 
>> Show me where it says this in the policy.
> 
I have to agree with Michael here.  I don't know of any situation where proxies would
fail to be classified as utilization under ARIN policy.

> Is virtual hosting, vs IP-based hosting suggested/required of end-users in policy?
> 
Yes... NRPM 4.2.5 reads:

4.2.5. Web Hosting Policy

When an ISP submits a request for IP address space to be used for IP-based web hosting, it will supply (for informational purposes only) its technical justification for this practice. ARIN will analyze this data continuously, evaluating the need for future policy change.

Hope that helps..

Owen

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-discuss/attachments/20100522/55105299/attachment.html>