[arin-discuss] /20 initial allocation for single-homed server?

[michael.dillon at bt.com]

> Please start a new thread about IPv6 if you wish to rant about it.
> 
> Flawed policy if some random person with a _single server_, no BGP or
> multi-home can receive a /20 IPv4 or (for sake of argument) a /32 IPv6
> from ARIN.

Who is ranting?

Are you sure that there isn't enough /32 blocks available in IPv6 to do
what you propose?

As for this IPv4 user, they have roughly 2000 users connected, and
are buying enough hardware to support an additional 4000. Are you
saying that ARIN policy is flawed because it gives out a /20
to Internet Service Providers with only 6000 users connected?

--Michael Dillon