[arin-discuss] Suggestion 2010.1 -- Initial Fee Waiver for IPv6assignments to LRSA signatories

Tue Mar 2 17:03:28 EST 2010

I'll point out that the current fee waivers only cover allocations and not assignments.

The intent here was to get fee waivers for assignments. I'm not opposed to extending them to
everyone. However, I do think that any fee waiver offered to legacy holders should come
with the requirement that the legacy space be brought under LRSA.

It might be hard to implement a general fee waiver in such a way because at that point,
the legacy holder can simply avoid mentioning their legacy space and register a new
org to get around that requirement.

As stated earlier, my primary intent in this was to induce legacy holders to:

	1.	Bring their legacy space under LRSA
	2.	Move forward with IPv6

From the legacy holder's perspective, as things stand now, there are few benefits
and significant costs to doing either. This fee waiver would provide some benefit
to signing the LRSA and remove the cost of moving forward with IPv6.

Owen

On Mar 3, 2010, at 1:14 AM, Brian Johnson wrote:

> Exactly! Everyone should be treated the same relative to IPv6 requests.
>  
> - Brian
>  
> From: Aaron Wendel [mailto:aaron at wholesaleinternet.net] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 11:12 AM
> To: Brian Johnson; 'Owen DeLong'
> Cc: arin-discuss at arin.net
> Subject: RE: [arin-discuss] Suggestion 2010.1 -- Initial Fee Waiver for IPv6assignments to LRSA signatories
>  
> I would be all for ARIN extending the current fee waivers to encompass both legacy space holders who sign an LRSA for their old space and an RSA for the new space as well as end users.  I just put in for some critical infrastructure v6 space and was a little surprised when I got hit for full freight as an end user.  It’s a non starter for v6 on my little, local, free exchange as I assume it would be for many others.  Just level the playing field so everyone pays on the same scale.  That would be a start. J
>  
> Aaron
>  
>  
> From: arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Brian Johnson
> Sent: Monday, March 01, 2010 8:27 AM
> To: Owen DeLong
> Cc: arin-discuss at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] Suggestion 2010.1 -- Initial Fee Waiver for IPv6assignments to LRSA signatories
>  
> Here’s how I think it should go. If I’m an LRSA holder and want IPv6 space, I would have to sign a normal RSA for the IPv6 space and pay the fees as a regular space holder, just like any other RSA holder. I am willing to encourage IPv6 as long as we don’t get into a battle between legacy and non legacy holders over fees. Neither should be getting a “better deal” than the other.
>  
> I hope this makes my position clear.
>  
> - Brian
>  
> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen at delong.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2010 9:26 PM
> To: Brian Johnson
> Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] Suggestion 2010.1 -- Initial Fee Waiver for IPv6assignments to LRSA signatories
>  
> Not really... They get a special rate on the initial IPv6 assignment, but, after that, they're paying the same $100/year
> that every other end-user is paying.
>  
> The intent here is to induce them to both embrace IPv6 _AND_ start paying for their IPv4 under end-user terms
> rather than keep their legacy status and exclusion from the ARIN community and policies altogether so long
> as they can avoid dealing with IPv6.
>  
> As I see it, the alternative is that we have yet another group of users with an additional incentive to push back
> against IPv6 which I regard as harmful to the internet in general.
>  
> Owen
>  
> On Feb 27, 2010, at 12:59 PM, Brian Johnson wrote:
>  
> 
> Owen,
>  
> I would still be opposed under the idea that they would deserve special rates. This would perpetuate the idea of multiple classes of members / space holders that I would like to see diminished if not eliminated.
>  
> - Brian
>  
> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:owen at delong.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2010 5:16 AM
> To: Brian Johnson
> Cc: arin-discuss at arin.net
> Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] Suggestion 2010.1 -- Initial Fee Waiver for IPv6assignments to LRSA signatories
>  
> Brian,
>           The IPv6 space under this suggestion would be subject to regular RSA, not LRSA.
> Only the legacy space would be covered by the LRSA.  With that clarification, do you
> still oppose the suggestion? (I'll note that the suggestion relates to reducing fees, ARIN
> policy already provides for them to get the space on these terms).
>  
> Owen
>  
> On Feb 25, 2010, at 6:27 AM, Brian Johnson wrote:
>  
> 
> I oppose this proposal as it maintains the current divide between legacy space and “regular” space. If a legacy holder wants IPv6 space, they would need to sign a regular RSA and join the rest of us.
>  
> - Brian
>  
> From: arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
> Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 10:39 PM
> To: arin-discuss at arin.net
> Subject: [arin-discuss] Suggestion 2010.1 -- Initial Fee Waiver for IPv6assignments to LRSA signatories
>  
> I have submitted a formal suggestion to the ACSP recommending that the BoT waive initial
> assignment fees for IPv6 when the applicant is a legacy resource holder that has signed
> the LRSA.
>  
> I believe this helps remove most of the barriers to entry for legacy IPv4 holders to migrate
> to IPv6 and is in the best interests of the community.
>  
> ARIN has informed me that the matter will be placed on the Board's finance committee
> agenda.  As such, I would like to encourage members here who have an opinion on the
> matter to let the board know what you think, ideally by posting a message to this list.
>  
>  
> Owen
>  
>  
> Below is the message I received from ARIN and the original suggestion I submitted:
>  
> Owen,
> 
> 
> This is in response to your suggestion noted below and assigned number 2010.1.
> 
> Thank you for your suggestion relating to charging no initial fee related to request for an initial IPv6 allocation and/or assignments for Legacy Holders that have signed the ARIN Legacy Registration Service Agreement.  As this relates to fees, this will be added to the ARIN Board's Finance Committee agenda for 2010.
> 
> Some other information related to this suggestion is that the current IPv6 waiver for allocations for initial requests and renewals in 2010 is a 50% fee waiver. For requests in 2011, the allocation fees will be 25% waived. 
> In terms of assignments, the initial fee is not waived.  Clients requesting assignment resources pay an initial fee per request of address space and thereafter pay annual allocation or maintenance fees related to the Organizational ID as a whole. Initial fees are to cover the effort related to reviewing and analyzing the request, whereas maintenance fees are designed to cover the overhead of maintaining objects in the database.
> 
> Recent changes were implemented in mid 2009 for organizations with both ARIN-issued and Legacy Resources. They are assessed an Annual Fee based on the ARIN-issued resources and not charged the Legacy resource maintenance fee.
> 
> ARIN is reliant on its active membership to help it better serve the community and we want to commend you for your continuing activism and service.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Member Services
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
> 
> *********************************************
> 
> 2010.1
> 01-18-2010 16:58:30
> 
> ARIN should offer legacy holders that sign the LRSA the opportunity to receive an appropriate IPv6 allocation or assignment for no initial fee. The applicable standard renewal fees would apply thereafter.
> 
> 
>  
>  
>  CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the
> intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
> copying, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
> contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2716 - Release Date: 03/01/10 01:34:00
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-discuss/attachments/20100303/4b8d675d/attachment.html>