[arin-discuss] IPv6 End User Assignments

[Matthew Wilder]

Michael,

I have to agree very strongly with Aaron.  I would rather you stay out of the conversation if you want to communicate as harshly and disrespectfully as you are.  

Please don't point out how you are gathering all kinds of information and promoting understanding in one phrase, and then indicate you are not here to lead anybody in another.  I can only assume from this you are either insane, or have a gross misunderstanding of the word leadership.

This is indeed a community.  Until you entered the discussion, people were learning about the best practices of IPv6 deployment.  You are certainly making it hard for that conversation to continue.

Hoping you can change your approach,
Matthew Wilder


Michael Dillon wrote:
> There are plenty of other places to discuss IPv6 technical issues 
> and the biggest benefit of going elsewhere is that you can find some 
> expert advice there.
> 
> Sorry, but I'm not here to lead anybody. This list is not for 
> leadership, it's for discussion. I cast in my two bits worth and people 
> either get it, or they don't.
> 
> Community? I don't see any community here. Sorry but this is the ARIN 
> members discussion list where most days, there is zero discussion. Many 
> members don't even monitor this list.
> Check the archives to see what I mean.
> 
> And you're behavior is distracting us from the discussion of the topic 
> in the subject line. IPv6 end user assignments.
> 
> Start by reading
> <http://www.getipv6.info/index.php/IPv6_Addressing_Plans>
> and then if you want to see where it came from, follow up the RFCs and 
> Internet drafts referenced on it. You could also Google for something 
> like "dillon nanog ipv6 addressing" and pick up the original discussions 
> that led to this page. It was well over a year ago, maybe two.
> 
> And if you know of an IPv6 deployment mailing list other than NANOG, 
> feel free to tell us all about it.