[arin-discuss] Good Stewardship by example, I'd like to RETURN a /20
Scott Leibrand
scottleibrand at gmail.com
Fri Jul 24 14:12:51 EDT 2009
Vaughn,
It's good to see more folks getting interested. I'm not sure that small
ISPs were under-represented before, but either way, more participation
and wider representation will definitely help. Thanks.
All,
If you haven't already, please subscribe to PPML, speak up on any policy
proposals of interest, and be sure to participate (in person or
remotely) at the next Public Policy Meeting. There are still a lot of
policy issues on the table, many of which touch on the topics we've been
discussing here the last few days.
Also, feel free to contact me, or any other AC member, if you need any
background or other assistance getting up to speed on things. You can
find us all at https://www.arin.net/about_us/ac.html.
Thanks,
Scott
VAUGHN THURMAN - SWIFT SYSTEMS INC wrote:
>
> Thanks for fleshing that out Owen.
>
> I think the issue is that small ISP’s (overworked and often
> overwhelmed) have not been paying attention.
>
> I think the “community” is being represented by a subset that seems to
> have (opinion here, not asserting as fact) been under-representing the
> small ISP’s, which by the way make up the bulk of the community – the
> silent majority in fact.
>
> I hope I am not the only part of the sleeping bear that has been
> awakened, but believe we are paying more attention now. You might not
> be so lonely on that stance should it come up again.
>
> ~Vaughn
>
> *From:* Owen DeLong [mailto:owen at delong.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, July 24, 2009 11:15 AM
> *To:* VAUGHN THURMAN - SWIFT SYSTEMS INC
> *Cc:* arin-discuss at arin.net
> *Subject:* Re: [arin-discuss] Good Stewardship by example, I'd like to
> RETURN a /20
>
>
> PS. I also just learned (from an offline conversation, quote
> below) that
> ARIN recently set a policy to allow the selling of IP space (paid
> transfers)
> between organizations. Does this seem counter to good stewardship
> in a time
> of impending depletion? If I have my head on straight, this is a
> pretty
> kind act towards those same early/big assignment holders, isn't it?
>
> You say "ARIN recently set" as if ARIN was some third party setting policy
>
> independent of input from the membership or the community.
>
> While the policy proposals in question took a tortured and circuitous
> route
>
> to adoption, it was definitely done with community input and support
>
> throughout the process.
>
> It is a matter of record that I was the only dissenting voice in passing
>
> policy proposal 2009-1, and, that I did so strictly because I felt
> that the
>
> community's interests were not represented in the removal of the sunset
>
> clause. Given the lack of support for subsequently restoring the sunset
>
> clause both in the AC and apparently on PPML, I can only conclude
>
> that my belief the community wanted the sunset clause may well have
>
> been incorrect.
>
> While I remain unconvinced that a liberalized transfer policy is good
>
> policy, I am convinced that of the community which was participating
>
> in policy development at the time the issue was being considered, there
>
> was/is strong support for such a policy.
>
> I do not believe the ARIN should adopt bad policy just because there
>
> is strong community support for it. However, I do believe that if ARIN
>
> (specifically the AC and the BoT) are going to go against strong
>
> community support, then, they should be somewhat certain that the
>
> policy in question is bad policy. I am not sufficiently certain that the
>
> relaxed transfer policy is bad policy.
>
> Owen
>
> The opinions above are mine and mine alone. I am not speaking
>
> for the AC and many members of the AC disagree with me on
>
> this subject.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-Discuss
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
> Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
More information about the ARIN-discuss
mailing list