[arin-discuss] Importance of Corporate Governance

[Chad Kissinger]

Yeah, and I can claim to be your daddy.  Does that make it true?

Just because some lawyer dreamed up everything he could possibly think of to include in a court filing doesn't mean any of it means anything.  People sue each other all the time claiming that the other party did things that they, indeed, didn't do.  If you really were involved with a substantial business, you'd know that.

I've been watching this now for weeks by my estimation, and am stunned that this has been going on for so long.  You've been assaulting the character of Paul Vixie for weeks now and, apparently, the worst you can say about him is that somebody sued him once and made some big claims when they did.

I think Dean is full of it.  I don't think he has a lawyer and if he does, I don't think he has the resources or the standing to do anything about whatever perceived wrong he thinks there is (does anyone really know what that is?) I think Dean is his own lawyer and, having dealt with lots of real lawyers for a long time, I think Dean probably isn't a very good one...

I second the idea of having some way for the list members to vote on killing a thread/list membership... you can be a member of ARIN and participate, but if you're going to shout endlessly and baselessly, the rest of us should be able to say shut up.


Onramp Access
chad kissinger  |  president  |  onramp access, inc.
p: 512.322.9200  |  f: 512.476.2878  |  www.onr.com
your internet operations  |  built  |  deployed  |  managed

-----Original Message-----
From: arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net [mailto:arin-discuss-bounces at arin.net] On Behalf Of Dean Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 2:50 PM
To: michael.dillon at bt.com
Cc: arin-discuss at arin.net
Subject: Re: [arin-discuss] Importance of Corporate Governance


Exactis v. MAPS (Colorado District Court Case Number 00-CV-2250)
cited charges of Tortious Interference with Contract, Tortious
Interference with Prospective Business Relations, violation of the
Colorado Consumer Protection Act, Intentional and Negligent
Misrepresentation and Extortion, violation of the Colorado
Communications Privacy Act, violation of the Colorado Organized Crime
Control Act, violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act, violation of the
Colorado Antitrust act

                --Dean

On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 michael.dillon at bt.com wrote:

> > The Exactis V. MAPS case was indeed an organized crime case.
>
> > The facts I cited are true.
>
> Not according to this copy of the court motion
> http://www.dotcomeon.com/exactis1.html
>
> In that document, the claim of organized crime does not
> appear in the Statement of Facts (section II) but in the
> Legal Argument (section III).
>
> According to this record
> http://www.dotcomeon.com/exactis.html
> the lawsuit with its claim of organized crime, did
> not succeed, as Exactis claimed it would in their
> injunction request. Instead, the case was dismissed.
>
> Half truths and innuendo are not facts.
>
> --Michael Dillon
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-Discuss
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN
> Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
> Please contact the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at info at arin.net
> if you experience any issues.
>
>

--
Av8 Internet   Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net         faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000


_______________________________________________
ARIN-Discuss
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN
Discussion Mailing List (ARIN-discuss at arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-discuss
Please contact the ARIN Member Services Help Desk at info at arin.net
if you experience any issues.