[arin-discuss] No quorum in last election

[J Bacher]

Dean Anderson wrote:

>>> The proof is in the meeting. Only the ballots represent members.  There
>>> were no abstain ballots to be cited as representing members. If there
>>> were abstain ballots, they should have been counted. But there were no
>>> such ballots.  The issue is a question of fact, not law.
>> Put up or shut up.  Where is the legal documentation that defines that an 
>> abstention require a vote identifying the abstention?
> 
> Where is your proof they abstained? You put up or shut up.

Gee there's a surprise.  You don't have it.  Pretty much makes your entire 
complaint invalid.  Thanks for participating, though.