[arin-discuss] No quorum in last election

[J Bacher]

Dean Anderson wrote:
> The proof is in the meeting. Only the ballots represent members.  There
> were no abstain ballots to be cited as representing members. If there
> were abstain ballots, they should have been counted. But there were no
> such ballots.  The issue is a question of fact, not law.

Put up or shut up.  Where is the legal documentation that defines that an 
abstention require a vote identifying the abstention?