guideline for name-based web hosting justification
drechsau at geeks.org
Wed Sep 13 11:42:22 EDT 2000
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 08:57:24AM -0600, Alec H. Peterson wrote:
> Mike Horwath wrote:
> > Same here.
> > Where we could get away with header parsing, we have.
> > Where we can not, we must use an IP, and if we need to, we will put up
> > a bunch of other shit as well since 99.9% of the customers we do web
> > hosting for also get all of their email from us, we can just run
> > virtual servers for them for their mail on their 'dedicated IP'. No
> > biggie, the mail cluster is going in behind loadbalancers with the web
> > boxes, this will be easy.
> And I think that's a great setup.
> Just out of curiosity, would you mind sharing how large a website
> you can put on a name-based virtual host before you have to move it
That is a good question. We don't allow sites larger than 100MB/month
transferred onto the smaller systems.
> Also, for e-mail, have you tried giving users longer POP usernames?
> (like user at domain.com?) I know it isn't a perfect solution, but
> I've seen lots of places doing that and it seems to work perfectly
> well. I do seem to recall some older versions of Eudora over-load
> the @ operator as a delimiter, but I think they've fixed that...
The new cluster will do this, the old system does not.
Mike Horwath IRC: Drechsau drechsau at Geeks.ORG
Home: 763-540-6815 1901 Sumter Ave N, Golden Valley, MN 55427
Opinions stated in this message, or any message posted by myself
through my Geeks.ORG address, are mine and mine alone, period.
More information about the ARIN-discuss