<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
On Aug 17, 2015, at 10:11 AM, Mike Burns <<a href="mailto:mike@iptrading.com" class="">mike@iptrading.com</a>> wrote:<br class="">
<div>
<blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div class="WordSection1" style="page: WordSection1; font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" class="">
<span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);" class="">Hello,<o:p class=""></o:p></span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" class="">
<span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);" class=""> </span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" class="">
<span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);" class="">Per my brief correspondence below, I think that the change of the RSA to have sections 7(b) and 7(c) continue to cover all resources instead of just Included
Resources will give pause to any large holder who for any reason wants to sign an RSA on some of its space.</span></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br class="">
</div>
Mike - </div>
<div> </div>
<div> To be clear, the language in 7(b) and 7(c) is existing language in the present RSA/LRSA</div>
<div> agreements, i.e. there is not a change proposed by ARIN to add anything to these sections.</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div> Sections 7(a) and 7(d) have proposed changes (to make their scope more explicit to be </div>
<div> simply “Included Number Resources”) and, if I understand you correctly, you believe that</div>
<div> a similar change should be done to 7(b)/7(c)</div>
<div><br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">
<div class="WordSection1" style="page: WordSection1; font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;">
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" class="">
<span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);" class=""><o:p class=""></o:p></span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" class="">
<span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);" class="">The language is overly broad, IMO, and goes beyond the scope of an agreement over the registration of a particular and defined subset of all resources.<o:p class=""></o:p></span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" class="">
<span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);" class=""> </span></div>
<div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" class="">
<span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 73, 125);" class="">Reasonable people can disagree over the property status of legacy space. If you want reasonable people to sign this RSA, take out these un-necessary extensions
of the agreement.<span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span></span></div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br class="">
</div>
<div> As noted, the proposed agreement includes changes to more specifically qualify two of </div>
<div> the four statements in section 7 to apply to the particular resources (“Included number</div>
<div> resources”)</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div> From your message, I would surmise that these changes to 7(a) and 7(d), in and of </div>
<div> themselves, are not sufficient in your view to address the issue?</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>Thanks!</div>
<div>/John</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>John Curran</div>
<div>President and CEO</div>
<div>ARIN</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<br class="">
</body>
</html>