<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">
<div>
<div>
<div>This is in regards to the fee schedule change.</div>
</div>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; ">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I think this looks good, however, I think there may perhaps be an unintended consequence.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a href="https://www.arin.net/fees/proposed_fee_schedule.html">https://www.arin.net/fees/proposed_fee_schedule.html</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"></span>For companies who are XX-Small and X-Small with IPv4 all likely had free IPv6 allocations of a /32 or larger. If my recollection serves me correctly, nothing smaller than a /32 was being offered
for a considerable amount of time. Would this not inadvertently double or quadruple their fees?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space:pre"></span>I think this has been discussed on some level and the question was asked "how many fit in this category". I don't recall an answer being given. I think this is an appropriate standard overall,
however, I think some leniency should be given to the early adoptors who could not receive any less than a /32. Say people who received IPv6 allocations up to X date are billed based on their IPv4 size rather than their IPv6 size until their IPv4 or IPv6 allocations
grow. At which point their "grandfathering" would cease.</div>
<div>
<div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Thoughts?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-- </div>
<div>Jesse D. Geddis</div>
</div>
<div>LA Broadband LLC</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</span>
</body>
</html>