[ARIN-consult] Consultation on Requiring Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) for ARIN Online Accounts

Chris Woodfield chris at semihuman.com
Tue May 24 20:25:07 EDT 2022


<speaking_for_myself.disclaimer>

If given the choice between and SMS-based second factor and no second factor at all, which would you choose? 

I agree that SMS is the weakest form of 2FA of the options being considered, and I would not be happy with a system that only supported it and did not support TOTP or FIDO2. I would find it highly unlikely, however, that requiring 2FA for logins and *not* allowing SMS as an option will prove a successful approach, however - it’s Just Complex Enough that I can see a far-too-large segment of ARIN’s user base requiring quite a bit of support to enable it. 

-C

> On May 24, 2022, at 12:23 PM, Max Krivanek via ARIN-consult <arin-consult at arin.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I find SMS highly insecure since it can be intercepted (it goes across the system in plain text, similar to HTTP) and there is also SIM hijacking. This article by Krebs goes into more detail of why it's insecure.
> https://krebsonsecurity.com/2021/03/can-we-stop-pretending-sms-is-secure-now/ <https://krebsonsecurity.com/2021/03/can-we-stop-pretending-sms-is-secure-now/>
> 
> The fact that major financial institutions use it is a detriment to them.  As TOTP or FIDO2 are way more secure. But this is where reality hits the road.  Most people will not want to set up TOTP or FIDO2, but as long as those of us who are more security minded can make sure SMS or the phone number in general cannot be used for authentication purposes I would be fine with including it as a stop gap.
> 
> On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 1:59 PM Richard Laager <rlaager at wiktel.com <mailto:rlaager at wiktel.com>> wrote:
> I believe ARIN absolutely should require 2FA. Your actual experience with dictionary attacks confirms that.
> 
> SMS 2FA seems like a pragmatic compromise. I’m aware that SMS is generally considered a less secure 2nd factor, but: 1) I’m not sure how much less secure it really is. It obviously cannot be worse than a password alone. 2) Major financial institutions seem okay with it. 3) It might be necessary in practice to get people to turn on / accept 2FA.
> 
> You will have to think hard about recovery procedures. They will become the weak link in the security.
> 
> -- 
> Richard
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-Consult
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Consult Mailing
> List (ARIN-consult at arin.net <mailto:ARIN-consult at arin.net>).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult <https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult> Please contact the ARIN Member Services
> Help Desk at info at arin.net <mailto:info at arin.net> if you experience any issues.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Max Krivanek
> Managing Member
> CodingDirect <http://www.codingdirect.com/>
> 
> Phone: (682) 232-4867 <>
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-Consult
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Consult Mailing
> List (ARIN-consult at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult Please contact the ARIN Member Services
> Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20220524/e9afc5d2/attachment.htm>


More information about the ARIN-consult mailing list