[ARIN-consult] ACSP Consultation 2022.2: Consultation on Elections and the Nomination Process
scottleibrand at gmail.com
Fri Feb 11 22:48:19 EST 2022
This looks like a very substantial improvement that addresses most of
the issues and concerns raised by the community. Thanks for proposing such
a substantial improvement.
But I am a bit unclear on the details of the tripartite (or is
it quadripartite?) rating system.
Is this understanding correct?:
If the NomCom rates a candidate (for Board or AC) “Well Qualified”,
“Qualified”, or “Qualifications not Demonstrated” on the weighted average
of the criteria in the Board Guidance Letter, that candidate is added to
the slate, and their rating and the reasons for that rating are published
when the slate is announced. The NomCom can only classify a candidate as
"Unable to Qualify” if there exists an objective reason for their inability
to serve (such as unresolvable conflict of interest, documented
misrepresentation, or past conviction of crime or fraud), in which case
that candidate is not added to the slate, they are (privately) informed of
that fact, and they can use the petition process if desired. If they
petition, (I presume?) ARIN may publish a statement on why they were
classified as Unable to Qualify.
Did I get all of that right? If so, I support these changes, but I would
encourage you to clarify the process a bit to make it easier to understand
without having to carefully re-read and cross-reference both
the consultation and its FAQ multiple times. (Feel free to use my summary
above if it's clear, correct, and useful.)
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 11:37 AM ARIN <info at arin.net> wrote:
> The Board of Trustees maintains authority over the scope, mission, and
> along with the President and Chief Executive Officer establishes ARIN’s
> strategic direction and fiscal oversight. The Board also has oversight
> authority of the nomination, appointment, and election of individuals to
> Board committees and similar roles.
> Over the past two years, as part of its fiduciary duties, the ARIN Board
> of Trustees (“Board”) has undertaken a review of ARIN’s governance
> structures, including Elections and Nominations processes. As part of this
> effort, an independent, outside consultant was engaged to review ARIN’s
> governance structures and provide recommendations.
> One recommendation that has arisen from this governance review is to make
> changes to the existing election and nomination processes. The proposed
> changes will ensure board independence, transparency, and impartiality.
> Board Guidance Letter
> • The Board Guidance Letter (for each of the Board of Trustees and the
> Advisory Council) contains "Highly Recommended" and "Recommended"
> attributes and assigns a weighting to each attribute.
> • The evaluation of each candidate would be tied to the degree to which
> each attribute was satisfied.
> Nomination Committee Selection
> • The Nomination Committee (NomCom) has seven members in total, with the
> members serving staggered two-year terms to ensure continuity and
> succession planning. The NomCom Board members select non-board members via
> an open call for nominations, appointing two or three members per year to
> reach the total membership of seven. Up to two Advisory Council (AC)
> members can serve on the NomCom.
> • The NomCom is chaired by a Board Member.
> Anyone can self-nominate by completing the questionnaire for the position
> sought. Nominees must reside within the ARIN region.
> Review of Potential Candidates
> • The Nomination Committee (NomCom) would review nominees based on the
> Board Guidance Letter, responses to questionnaires, responses to
> third-party interviews (Board of Trustees only), material issues from
> background checks (Board of Trustees only) and the review of ARIN files,
> and other information available to the NomCom.
> • The Board Guidance Letter defines "Highly Recommended" and "Recommended"
> attributes. The NomCom would classify each qualified nominee as "Well
> Qualified," "Qualified" or "Qualifications not Demonstrated" based on
> evaluation of these attributes, in a fashion like that used by the American
> Bar Association (ABA) Federal Judiciary process. All qualified nominees
> would be added to the slate as candidates for election. The reasons for
> classifications would be published when the slate is announced.
> • The NomCom would evaluate each nominee on each weighted attribute to
> inform the classification process. Any nominee classified as “Unable to
> Qualify” would not be added to the slate.
> • Nominee questionnaires would include questions about the attributes
> defined in the Board Guidance Letter.
> • The NomCom would report on the total number of individuals assessed for
> the election cycle.
> Background Check Process
> The process is outlined in ARIN’s Election Processes document (Section
> V(e)) and remains unchanged.
> ARIN’s GC and Sr. Director of HR & Administration (HR Director) will
> arrange for a third- party vendor to conduct background checks for selected
> nominees. ARIN’s GC and HR Director will review the reports for each
> nominee and determine if there are any material issues with their
> background. If any material issues are found, they will review the nature
> of the background issue with the nominee. If after consultation with the
> nominee, ARIN’s GC and HR Director still deems the issue as material, they
> will notify the nominee that the relevant information will be provided to
> the NomCom unless the nominee withdraws their candidacy. Relevant material
> information may include information, if any, from a former ARIN volunteer’s
> or former ARIN employee’s individual file. A nominee will be given the
> opportunity to provide a statement addressing the issue which will also be
> provided to the NomCom. If the nominee does not withdraw their candidacy,
> the relevant information including the nominee’s statement, if any, will be
> provided to the NomCom for consideration.
> Board Proposal:
> ARIN will make changes to the selection of the NomCom, the Nomination
> process, and the candidate review and rating system.
> The proposed changes will ensure board independence, transparency, and
> impartiality. ARIN seeks community feedback on these proposed changes:
> This consultation will remain open for 15 days.
> An Appendix FAQ that further details the rationale for these changes and
> additional information is available at:
> Please provide comments to arin-consult at arin.net. You can subscribe to
> this mailing list at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult.
> Discussion on arin-consult at arin.net will close on 28 February 2022.
> John Curran
> President and CEO
> American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN
> Consult Mailing
> List (ARIN-consult at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult Please contact the
> ARIN Member Services
> Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ARIN-consult