[ARIN-consult] Consultation on ARIN Fees

[John Curran]

On 23 Apr 2021, at 10:03 AM, John Curran <jcurran at arin.net<mailto:jcurran at arin.net>> wrote:
...
For organizations that have obtained IPv6 resources from ARIN under a separate RSA, the two most common size allocations are /32 (generally issued to ISPs) and /28 (generally issued to organizations for their own use).

The above sentence should read "For organizations that have obtained IPv6 resources from ARIN under a separate RSA, the two most common size allocations are /32 (generally issued to ISPs) and /48 (generally issued to organizations for their own use)."

(i.e. /48 not /28)

For those legacy resources holders with /16 blocks, I suspect that maintaining the separate LRSA with ARIN for legacy resource services and the applicable legacy fee cap will make the most sense (at least for the foreseeable future.)   I’ve quickly outlined the three most common cases below for your legacy IPv6 resource holders and believe them to be correct (although it has not been proofed by second set of eyes).  I’ll note that all presume that that the organizations would not consolidate to a single agreement with ARIN for reason noted above.

As the table may not have been readable for some depending on their mail agent, I’ve quickly reformatted and attached as pdf.

Best wishes,
/John

John Curran
President and CEO
American Registry for Internet Numbers


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20210423/ab50ddcc/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: merit.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 34644 bytes
Desc: merit.pdf
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20210423/ab50ddcc/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20210423/ab50ddcc/attachment-0003.htm>