From info at arin.net Wed Sep 6 14:18:44 2017 From: info at arin.net (ARIN) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 14:18:44 -0400 Subject: [ARIN-consult] Update on the Community Consultation on CKN23-ARIN Message-ID: <1345fda0-da07-cd7c-faa7-80a5c39d2070@arin.net> ARIN has finalized an implementation plan to address the issues described in the CKN23-ARIN consultation that was originally opened 22 March 2017. Based on community feedback, we have modified our original implementation plan as follows: * Restore the resource POC back to its original state on the resource record. This will allow contacts historically associated with a resource record to more readily administer that record going forward. * Remove CKN23-ARIN as the Admin and Tech POC on the Org record and replace it with the original resource POC. * Retain the Abuse POC on the Org. * Lock all Org and Resource records that have had their resource POC restored on the Resource record and added to the Org record as the Admin and Tech POC. This will ensure that any changes made by the Admin/Tech/Resource POC will first have to be reviewed by ARIN. Our intention is to interact directly with these affected Orgs so that we can obtain updated and accurate Whois information. We plan to complete this project by the end of November 2017. ARIN thanks the community for its feedback on this matter. You can view the full consultation regarding proposed changes to the handling of CKN23-ARIN at: https://arin.net/participate/acsp/community_consult/03-22-2017_CKN23.html Regards, Leslie Nobile Senior Director of Global Registry Knowledge American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) From 3johnl at gmail.com Thu Sep 7 05:32:23 2017 From: 3johnl at gmail.com (John Springer) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 02:32:23 -0700 Subject: [ARIN-consult] Community Consultation on Increasing the Size of the ARIN Board of Trustees In-Reply-To: References: <98b0694a-42fe-ee6a-6ea1-d34e5e4c0fbd@arin.net> <6320D8C2-01EA-487D-B58E-B6BD1915C97F@egate.net> Message-ID: I never saw a response to this. Is there any such thing? I see that Tempkin at NANOG is doing a little hand wringing about the NANOG nominations and I would like to have some sense of where ARIN is at officially on the subject of diversity before I run my mouth. The RIPE diversity initiative is burbling along and NANOG could surely use some work, but what to say, what to say. John Springer On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 6:24 AM, David R Huberman wrote: > Now that Thursday's Board meeting has come and gone, may we please have a > statement of "next steps" or some sort of commentary on how this > consultation was received and what's being acted on moving forward? > > It is my opinion that the Board still has a clear mandate from the broader > ARIN community to become more diverse in its membership. So if that's > correct, I hope to see continued efforts towards fulfilling that mandate. > > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-Consult > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN > Consult Mailing > List (ARIN-consult at arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult Please contact the > ARIN Member Services > Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jcurran at arin.net Thu Sep 7 06:41:00 2017 From: jcurran at arin.net (John Curran) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 10:41:00 +0000 Subject: [ARIN-consult] Community Consultation on Increasing the Size of the ARIN Board of Trustees In-Reply-To: References: <98b0694a-42fe-ee6a-6ea1-d34e5e4c0fbd@arin.net> <6320D8C2-01EA-487D-B58E-B6BD1915C97F@egate.net> Message-ID: <521F803D-C8B4-4441-8632-632874A23F32@arin.net> On 7 Sep 2017, at 5:32 AM, John Springer <3johnl at gmail.com> wrote: I never saw a response to this. Is there any such thing? I see that Tempkin at NANOG is doing a little hand wringing about the NANOG nominations and I would like to have some sense of where ARIN is at officially on the subject of diversity before I run my mouth. The RIPE diversity initiative is burbling along and NANOG could surely use some work, but what to say, what to say. John - Regarding the specific community consultation (on increasing the size of the ARIN Board), the proposed change was considered during the recent ARIN Board workshop that occurred on 15-16 August, and was put to vote. The motion to increase the size of the Board of Trustees failed to meet the necessary approval threshold, and thus failed to pass. Minutes of the ARIN Board meetings are here: https://www.arin.net/about_us/bot/index.html FYI, /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jschiller at google.com Thu Sep 7 07:04:15 2017 From: jschiller at google.com (Jason Schiller) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 07:04:15 -0400 Subject: [ARIN-consult] Community Consultation on Increasing the Size of the ARIN Board of Trustees In-Reply-To: References: <98b0694a-42fe-ee6a-6ea1-d34e5e4c0fbd@arin.net> <6320D8C2-01EA-487D-B58E-B6BD1915C97F@egate.net> Message-ID: For what it is worth, we have two open ARIN board seats, no incumbents, only one white male running, and all of the diversity candidates have good executive experience. We will have one diversity member, and perhaps two. ___Jason On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:32 AM, John Springer <3johnl at gmail.com> wrote: > I never saw a response to this. Is there any such thing? > > I see that Tempkin at NANOG is doing a little hand wringing about the > NANOG nominations and I would like to have some sense of where ARIN is at > officially on the subject of diversity before I run my mouth. The RIPE > diversity initiative is burbling along and NANOG could surely use some > work, but what to say, what to say. > > John Springer > > > On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 6:24 AM, David R Huberman > wrote: > >> Now that Thursday's Board meeting has come and gone, may we please have a >> statement of "next steps" or some sort of commentary on how this >> consultation was received and what's being acted on moving forward? >> >> It is my opinion that the Board still has a clear mandate from the >> broader ARIN community to become more diverse in its membership. So if >> that's correct, I hope to see continued efforts towards fulfilling that >> mandate. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ARIN-Consult >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN >> Consult Mailing >> List (ARIN-consult at arin.net). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult Please contact the >> ARIN Member Services >> Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues. >> > > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-Consult > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN > Consult Mailing > List (ARIN-consult at arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult Please contact the > ARIN Member Services > Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues. > -- _______________________________________________________ Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschiller at google.com|571-266-0006 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jcurran at arin.net Thu Sep 7 08:44:02 2017 From: jcurran at arin.net (John Curran) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 12:44:02 +0000 Subject: [ARIN-consult] Community Consultation on Increasing the Size of the ARIN Board of Trustees In-Reply-To: References: <98b0694a-42fe-ee6a-6ea1-d34e5e4c0fbd@arin.net> <6320D8C2-01EA-487D-B58E-B6BD1915C97F@egate.net>

Message-ID: On 7 Sep 2017, at 7:04 AM, Jason Schiller > wrote: For what it is worth, we have two open ARIN board seats, no incumbents, only one white male running, and all of the diversity candidates have good executive experience. We will have one diversity member, and perhaps two. For reference, the slate of candidates has now been announced (attached below) /John === Begin forwarded message: From: ARIN > Subject: [arin-announce] ARIN Announces the 2017 Final Slate of Candidates Date: 7 September 2017 at 8:39:13 AM EDT To: > The 2017 ARIN Elections will be held online beginning at 6:00 PM EDT on Thursday, October 5 through 6:00 PM EDT on Friday, 13 October for two seats on the ARIN Board of Trustees and five seats on the Advisory Council (AC) with terms beginning 1 January 2018. ARIN Trustee Bill Woodcock and AC members Andrew Dul, David Farmer, Leif Sawyer, Chris Tacit, and Chris Woodfield will conclude their current terms on 31 December 2017. Timothy Denton tendered his resignation and concluded his term in August 2017. The ARIN Board of Trustees? current appointment, Merike Kaeo, will conclude her term on 31 December 2017. The final 2017 candidate slate includes: ARIN Advisory Council ? Andrew Dul, CrowdStrike ? Paul Emmons, Ninja-IX Corporation ? David Farmer, University of Minnesota ? Joseph Karam, Princeton University ? Elford Parsons, The Telecommunications Regulatory Commission (British Virgin Islands) ? Kerrie-Ann Richards, VFJ Coding Ltd ? Leif Sawyer, General Communication, Inc. ? Chris Tacit, Tacit Law ? Alicia Trotman, Government of Barbados, Telecommunications Unit ? Chris Woodfield, Salesforce.com, Inc. ARIN Board of Trustees ? Dan Alexander, Comcast Cable LLC ? Nancy Carter, CANARIE Inc. ? Leslie Daigle, Thinking Cat Enterprises ? Stephen Lee, ArkiTechs Inc. ? Rodney Taylor, Government of Barbados, Data Processing Department In preparation for voting, you are encouraged to familiarize yourself with each candidate by taking the time to read candidate biographies, responses to candidate questions, and Statements of Support by visiting: https://www.arin.net/participate/elections On 5 October during ARIN 40 in San Jose, California, candidates will have the opportunity to address the membership. Candidate speeches will be posted online on 6 October. To view the election system instructions, please visit: https://www.arin.net/participate/elections/instructions.html#vote If you have questions regarding the ARIN Elections, please email members at arin.net. As a final reminder, Voting Contacts? participation in the online election process is a key responsibility that only takes a few minutes of your time. Plan now to cast your organization?s ballot online 5-13 October. Casting your organization?s vote has the power to shape the future of ARIN, our community, and the Internet. Thank you for voting! Regards, John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) _______________________________________________ ARIN-Announce You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Announce Mailing List (ARIN-announce at arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-announce Please contact info at arin.net if you experience any issues. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cja at daydream.com Thu Sep 7 09:14:05 2017 From: cja at daydream.com (Cj Aronson) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 07:14:05 -0600 Subject: [ARIN-consult] Community Consultation on Increasing the Size of the ARIN Board of Trustees In-Reply-To: References: <98b0694a-42fe-ee6a-6ea1-d34e5e4c0fbd@arin.net> <6320D8C2-01EA-487D-B58E-B6BD1915C97F@egate.net>

Message-ID: I just want to say that what Jason is pointing out here didn't happen by accident. A lot of folks worked hard to make this slate of candidates happen. I want to personally thank Bill Woodcock and the Nomcom for all the thought and hard work that went into getting this diverse slate of candidates to step forward to run. This is not the end of the work but the beginning. It's super awesome! Don't forget to vote! -----Cathy On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:04 AM, Jason Schiller wrote: > For what it is worth, we have two open ARIN board seats, no incumbents, > only one white male running, and all of the diversity candidates have > good executive experience. > > We will have one diversity member, and perhaps two. > > ___Jason > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:32 AM, John Springer <3johnl at gmail.com> wrote: > >> I never saw a response to this. Is there any such thing? >> >> I see that Tempkin at NANOG is doing a little hand wringing about the >> NANOG nominations and I would like to have some sense of where ARIN is at >> officially on the subject of diversity before I run my mouth. The RIPE >> diversity initiative is burbling along and NANOG could surely use some >> work, but what to say, what to say. >> >> John Springer >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 6:24 AM, David R Huberman >> wrote: >> >>> Now that Thursday's Board meeting has come and gone, may we please have >>> a statement of "next steps" or some sort of commentary on how this >>> consultation was received and what's being acted on moving forward? >>> >>> It is my opinion that the Board still has a clear mandate from the >>> broader ARIN community to become more diverse in its membership. So if >>> that's correct, I hope to see continued efforts towards fulfilling that >>> mandate. >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ARIN-Consult >>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN >>> Consult Mailing >>> List (ARIN-consult at arin.net). >>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >>> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult Please contact the >>> ARIN Member Services >>> Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues. >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ARIN-Consult >> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN >> Consult Mailing >> List (ARIN-consult at arin.net). >> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: >> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult Please contact the >> ARIN Member Services >> Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues. >> > > > > -- > _______________________________________________________ > Jason Schiller|NetOps|jschiller at google.com|571-266-0006 <(571)%20266-0006> > > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-Consult > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN > Consult Mailing > List (ARIN-consult at arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult Please contact the > ARIN Member Services > Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From woody at pch.net Thu Sep 7 12:58:29 2017 From: woody at pch.net (Bill Woodcock) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 09:58:29 -0700 Subject: [ARIN-consult] Community Consultation on Increasing the Size of the ARIN Board of Trustees In-Reply-To: <521F803D-C8B4-4441-8632-632874A23F32@arin.net> References: <98b0694a-42fe-ee6a-6ea1-d34e5e4c0fbd@arin.net> <6320D8C2-01EA-487D-B58E-B6BD1915C97F@egate.net> <521F803D-C8B4-4441-8632-632874A23F32@arin.net> Message-ID: > On Sep 7, 2017, at 3:41 AM, John Curran wrote: > > On 7 Sep 2017, at 5:32 AM, John Springer <3johnl at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I never saw a response to this. Is there any such thing? >> >> I see that Tempkin at NANOG is doing a little hand wringing about the NANOG nominations and I would like to have some sense of where ARIN is at officially on the subject of diversity before I run my mouth. The RIPE diversity initiative is burbling along and NANOG could surely use some work, but what to say, what to say. > > John - > > Regarding the specific community consultation (on increasing the size of > the ARIN Board), the proposed change was considered during the recent > ARIN Board workshop that occurred on 15-16 August, and was put to vote. > > The motion to increase the size of the Board of Trustees failed to meet the > necessary approval threshold, and thus failed to pass. Minutes of the ARIN > Board meetings are here: https://www.arin.net/about_us/bot/index.html Speaking for myself, and not for the board as a whole, my sense was that the board has acknowledged both the math and the feedback that point out that there?s no connection between size and diversity, and that the board is treating the two as separate issue. Diversity is being addressed by not disqualifying candidates on the basis of their not being white guys. That appears to be working thus far. We?ll see how it goes in the election, but the slate that the nomcom has presented contains excellent candidates, far better-qualified than in an average year, and representing the diversity of ARIN membership. So, my take on that is ?so far, so good,? but we?ll see how it winds up after the election before calling it a complete success. Then, next year, we do it again, and by that point, we may be able to call the problem solved. Board size is controversial. There are some folks, like myself, who believe that larger boards are, by their very nature, unproductive, and thus to be eschewed. There are others whose principal argument seems to be that with a larger board, more people can slack off while still achieving quorum, who think that makes a larger board desirable. Me, I say that just goes to prove my point. At any rate, the motion to increase the size of the board did not pass, again. People can keep trying it. Whatever. Just seems like wasting time to me. -Bill From woody at pch.net Thu Sep 7 12:59:49 2017 From: woody at pch.net (Bill Woodcock) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 09:59:49 -0700 Subject: [ARIN-consult] Community Consultation on Increasing the Size of the ARIN Board of Trustees In-Reply-To: References: <98b0694a-42fe-ee6a-6ea1-d34e5e4c0fbd@arin.net> <6320D8C2-01EA-487D-B58E-B6BD1915C97F@egate.net>

Message-ID: <418F7457-0455-48E6-A31B-AB5812927B93@pch.net> > On Sep 7, 2017, at 6:14 AM, Cj Aronson wrote: > Don't forget to vote! Yay! -Bill From paul at egate.net Thu Sep 7 15:13:35 2017 From: paul at egate.net (Paul Andersen) Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:13:35 -0400 Subject: [ARIN-consult] Community Consultation on Increasing the Size of the ARIN Board of Trustees In-Reply-To: References: <98b0694a-42fe-ee6a-6ea1-d34e5e4c0fbd@arin.net> <6320D8C2-01EA-487D-B58E-B6BD1915C97F@egate.net> <521F803D-C8B4-4441-8632-632874A23F32@arin.net> Message-ID: <2EA33DB3-49CD-41D6-98BF-C416554E2825@egate.net> Much like the community consultation there was a lengthy discussion at the Board on whether this would lead to a more diverse set of viewpoints around the table. Ultimately a majority of the Board felt this would be a good step; however, it did not reach the threshold required for a bylaws change. I would say there is strong Board Consensus that there is not one silver bullet to solve the concerns raised by the community. We will need to continue to look at a wide range of initiatives - big and small - to widen the net. Some will work better then others but from my view this is not a problem solved overnight and one where we continually need to get new people engaged in the community. The Board will continue to look at ways we can assist in this area and as always community feedback continues to be very useful. Certainly areas like the fellowship program and outreach programs like ARIN On The Road have brought new blood into the community from areas we have not traditionally seen ? and I hope this continues. The Board is ultimately most effective when we have a wide range of viewpoints around the table with those views coming from diversity in areas such as gender, geography, background and skills. I urge the membership while trying to evaluate for the strongest candidates to consider all these factors. And my thanks to the NomCom and those in the community who helped the NomCom seek out a strong set of candidates to put in front of the membership. Good luck to all the candidates! Paul > On Sep 7, 2017, at 12:58 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote: > >> >> On Sep 7, 2017, at 3:41 AM, John Curran wrote: >> >> On 7 Sep 2017, at 5:32 AM, John Springer <3johnl at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I never saw a response to this. Is there any such thing? >>> >>> I see that Tempkin at NANOG is doing a little hand wringing about the NANOG nominations and I would like to have some sense of where ARIN is at officially on the subject of diversity before I run my mouth. The RIPE diversity initiative is burbling along and NANOG could surely use some work, but what to say, what to say. >> >> John - >> >> Regarding the specific community consultation (on increasing the size of >> the ARIN Board), the proposed change was considered during the recent >> ARIN Board workshop that occurred on 15-16 August, and was put to vote. >> >> The motion to increase the size of the Board of Trustees failed to meet the >> necessary approval threshold, and thus failed to pass. Minutes of the ARIN >> Board meetings are here: https://www.arin.net/about_us/bot/index.html > > Speaking for myself, and not for the board as a whole, my sense was that the board has acknowledged both the math and the feedback that point out that there?s no connection between size and diversity, and that the board is treating the two as separate issue. > > Diversity is being addressed by not disqualifying candidates on the basis of their not being white guys. That appears to be working thus far. We?ll see how it goes in the election, but the slate that the nomcom has presented contains excellent candidates, far better-qualified than in an average year, and representing the diversity of ARIN membership. So, my take on that is ?so far, so good,? but we?ll see how it winds up after the election before calling it a complete success. Then, next year, we do it again, and by that point, we may be able to call the problem solved. > > Board size is controversial. There are some folks, like myself, who believe that larger boards are, by their very nature, unproductive, and thus to be eschewed. There are others whose principal argument seems to be that with a larger board, more people can slack off while still achieving quorum, who think that makes a larger board desirable. Me, I say that just goes to prove my point. At any rate, the motion to increase the size of the board did not pass, again. People can keep trying it. Whatever. Just seems like wasting time to me. > > -Bill > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ARIN-Consult > You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Consult Mailing > List (ARIN-consult at arin.net). > Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: > http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult Please contact the ARIN Member Services > Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From info at arin.net Tue Sep 19 12:48:04 2017 From: info at arin.net (ARIN) Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 12:48:04 -0400 Subject: [ARIN-consult] Community Consultation on DMARC for ARIN Mailing Lists Is Now Closed Message-ID: <912929ab-1d1a-565f-314a-15de7cb7f322@arin.net> ARIN thanks those who provided valuable feedback during this consultation. This feedback will be used to help determine the appropriate next steps in our possible implementation of DMARC in response to a community suggestion. We will ensure any implementation we choose will not cause interruptions to those mailing list users who do not use DMARC themselves. Our implementation plan for moving forward will be communicated by Q1 of 2018. https://www.arin.net/participate/acsp/suggestions/2017-11.html Regards, Communications and Member Services American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)