[ARIN-consult] [arin-announce] Reminder: Consultation on Registration ServicesAgreement - MORE

John Curran jcurran at arin.net
Mon Aug 17 16:36:33 EDT 2015

On Aug 17, 2015, at 10:53 AM, Mike Burns <mike at iptrading.com<mailto:mike at iptrading.com>> wrote:
   As noted, the proposed agreement includes changes to more specifically qualify two of
   the four statements in section 7 to apply to the particular resources (“Included number

   From your message, I would surmise that these changes to 7(a) and 7(d), in and of
   themselves, are not sufficient in your view to address the issue?

The result of the changes is a Trojan Horse for any legacy holder, IMO.
The RSA comes in as if it were covering only specific access, and only upon deeper inspection does the signer realize he has given up all property rights, now and in the future, of all resources.
I ask again, what is the legal purpose for the generality of those clauses (7b and 7c) in the context of an agreement covering a specific an defined set of number resources?
And by context, I mean immediate literal context, where these clauses are bracketed by similar clauses which are not so general?

Mike -

The language in section 7 reflects ARIN’s existing RSA and LRSA agreements; the purpose
of the consultation is to gather feedback on a set of changes which have been suggested by
the community in the past and which ARIN is considering moving forward with.

If you support ARIN moving to the new agreements (or not), it would helpful to make your
views known.  If there are additional changes that you feel are necessary, please provide
some suggested language for those changes.


John Curran
President and CEO

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20150817/d809bac5/attachment.html>

More information about the ARIN-consult mailing list