[ARIN-consult] Fee Schedule Change Consultation

[Jo Rhett]

> "Jo" == Jo Rhett <jrhett at netconsonance.com> writes:
>    Jo> 2. I would support that included with the first bill which each
>    Jo> end user receives after the changes take effect, a promotion or
>    Jo> waiver which allows entities which have gotten an IPv6
>    Jo> allocation or who get one within (some period like 90 days tbd
>    Jo> by ARIN) to receive a discount for doing so which lasts for one
>    Jo> or more years but not indefinitely. This is explicitly "here is
>    Jo> a price raise, but you can avoid it by joining the future". It's
>    Jo> crass, but it may be very effective. I would ensure that people
>    Jo> who acquired IPv6 before this policy went into effect are not
>    Jo> left out. 

On Oct 31, 2012, at 6:35 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Does the IPv6 have to be advertised to the DFZ?
> (I am not suggesting it must be. Just asking for your opinion)


I would like to have verification that it was deployed. But I would leave that up to ARIN, most notably because enforcement of this would be an implementation detail.

-- 
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet projects.



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20121031/5c2090d9/attachment.html>