[ARIN-consult] Fee restructuring
jrhett at netconsonance.com
Sat Oct 27 19:27:49 EDT 2012
On Oct 27, 2012, at 4:11 PM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> First, this doesn't disincentivize IPv6 deployment, it only disincentives people getting allocations that are way, way larger than they need. Same as in IPv4.
It does add an annual fee for having an IPv6 allocation. Discounting the IPv6 allocation as I've proposed would remove that disincentive.
> Second, arguments that some other hypothetical person might suffer an increased burden, that are not borne out by the statistics, don't carry a heck of a lot of weight. If _you_ are unhappy with how _your_ fees are changing, I want to hear about it. Arguments about what someone else, who might or might not exist, might or might not think, are feckless.
My fees will increase and I support this proposal.
Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet projects.
More information about the ARIN-consult