[ARIN-consult] Fee restructuring

[Scott Leibrand]

+1

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Andrew Dul - andrew.dul <
andrew.dul at quark.net> wrote:

> On 2012-10-25 14:35, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
>> This fee restructuring places a number of incentives in the exactly
>> wrong direction.
>>
>> 1. In many cases (especially end users), their fees are doubled if
>> they adopt IPv6. At the very least, end users should not be made to
>> pay additional annual fees as a penalty for adopting IPv6. If
>> anything, I would suggest that ARIN consider a structure like this:
>>
>
>
> In general, I support the new fee schedule.  There is one area which I
> believe needs consideration.  For the smallest end-user (1 IPv4, 1 ASN, 1
> IPv6) their registration fees are  going to triple from $100 to $300.  I
> don't believe this is the message that ARIN wants to send to the world at
> large and these smallest organizations.  I don't know the number of orgs
> that are subject to this fee increase but my guess is that this is a
> significant number of end-user orgs.
>
> My suggestion for end-users would be the first 3 records per org-id are
> $100, then $100 for additional records.
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> ARIN-Consult
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN
> Consult Mailing
> List (ARIN-consult at arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> http://lists.arin.net/mailman/**listinfo/arin-consult<http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-consult>Please contact the ARIN Member Services
> Help Desk at info at arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-consult/attachments/20121026/86948da0/attachment.html>