[ARIN-consult] [arin-announce] Fee Schedule Change Consultation

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Fri Nov 16 10:20:03 EST 2012

On Nov 15, 2012, at 17:32 , William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>> Sorry, but as far as I'm concerned, the current state of the current proposal
>> is ARIN picking a fight with the legacy holders that fell for the LRSA.
> Hi Owen,
> What fight? A regular RSA signatory can walk in to court, validly
> claim contract of adhesion and then make the pitch that some portion
> of the contract should be voided for unconscionability with adhesion
> weighting the claim in his favor. An LRSA signatory doesn't even have
> that: it isn't a contract of adhesion when nothing is denied him for
> electing not to sign it.
> If you sign the LRSA and come to dislike how ARIN's policies evolve,
> you have no meaningful recourse. No fight to be fought.

I have no problem with the policies.

The proposed fee increases, OTOH...


More information about the ARIN-consult mailing list