<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Aptos;
panose-1:2 11 0 4 2 2 2 2 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#467886;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Aptos",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:11.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-US link="#467886" vlink="#96607D" style='word-wrap:break-word'><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>This message is sent on behalf of the Number Resource Organization (NRO) RPKI Program Manager:<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>As part of the <a href="https://www.nro.net/technical-coordination/security/certification/#rpki_program" title="https://www.nro.net/technical-coordination/security/certification/#rpki_program">NRO RPKI Program</a> we would like to know more about the community’s expectations with regard to consistency in RPKI implementations across the Regional Internet Registries (RIRs).Our end goal is to define what a single, global RPKI system would look like.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>We want to know more about the experience of managing resources through multiple RIRs in order to understand whether the differences in the RIRs' RPKI implementations are hindering RPKI adoption, more specifically Route Origin Authorization (ROA) creation, and if so, which differences are the most painful. This will allow us to focus on making those aspects of the RPKI system more consistent.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Are you a network operator with permissions to create ROAs for IP space allocated by multiple RIRs? If so, we would greatly appreciate your participation in our survey before September 12. <a href="https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CHLHLML" title="https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CHLHLML">https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/CHLHLML</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>We want to hear from those who have already created ROAs as well as those who may be considering creating ROAs but have not yet done so.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>If this is not you, please consider forwarding this email to anyone else you know who could participate in the survey.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Note that survey participants will be entered into a drawing for the equivalent to USD 35 e-gift voucher (If e-gift vouchers cannot be used in the winner's economy, an alternative gift will be provided).<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>We really appreciate your participation!<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Regards,<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Sofía Silva Berenguer<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>RPKI Program Manager, NRO / Process and Productivity Engineer, APNIC<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal> <o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>