ARIN Justified..
Clayton Lambert
Clay at exodus.net
Wed Jan 10 15:18:08 EST 2001
- Previous message: ARIN Justified..
- Next message: ARIN Justified..
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
requiring past allocations to adhere to a new policy is not what was discussed. Recovering vast amounts of previously allocated (and UNUSED) IP address space is an entirely DIFFERENT subject. I would not suggest applying new policies to existing USAGE. Remember, recovering unused IP space from /8s that are floating around out there is not the same as establishing a clearly defined, efficiency focused IP address usage policy that allows for exceptions but does require technical reasons (in the form of documentation) for not adhering to that policy. It should be clear in stating that policy and business model are NOT justification (as they are not technical reasons). On the same line, I think a technical justification exceptions should be protocol-based, not vendor based. -Clay -----Original Message----- From: owner-vwp at arin.net [mailto:owner-vwp at arin.net]On Behalf Of Charles Scott Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 11:48 AM To: bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com Cc: Gilbert Martin @ Learning Solutions; 'Joe DeCosta'; 'Chris Miller'; 'Jim Macknik'; 'vwp at arin.net' Subject: Re: ARIN Justified.. On Wed, 10 Jan 2001 bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > "grandfathered" delegations have been done so for a reason. > changing the rules after the fact and forcing renumbering > will bring legal challanges. This is a good point, but the same can be said of existing allocations when trying to justify additional address space. In otherwords, if a hosting service has currently deployed IP based hosting, which was necessary/reasonable/acceptable in the past, it would seem to be unfair to refuse additional address space until those conform to a new policy (which may require significant time and expense). Still, I belive that everyone has an interest in extending the life of IPv4 address space, particularly in many cases companies with historic large allocations, and should therefore be compliant with efforts to reclaim any large unused address space. But the question of what is more reasonable, to reclaim "unused" address space or force improved efficency of address space currently providing valuable service, seems to be a no-brainer.x Chuck Scott Gaslight Media
- Previous message: ARIN Justified..
- Next message: ARIN Justified..
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the VWP mailing list