ARIN Justified...
Justin W. Newton
justin at gid.net
Wed Jan 10 12:22:05 EST 2001
- Previous message: ARIN Justified...
- Next message: ARIN Justified...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
The challenge of course is that when they were allocated the space, current allocation policies were not in place, nor was a policy saying that the rules could be changed later, hence there is serious legal question over whether or not the rules can be changed after the fact. At 6:49 PM -0800 1/9/01, Clayton Lambert wrote: >As a person involved with a company that never had a /8 given to it...I say >it isn't that difficult...They back it up, or they lose it...Point. > >Clayton Lambert >Compliance Services Director, >Exodus Communications > >-----Original Message----- >From: Alec H. Peterson [mailto:ahp at hilander.com] >Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 6:46 PM >To: Clayton Lambert >Cc: 'Jim Macknik'; vwp at arin.net >Subject: Re: ARIN Justified... > > >Clayton Lambert wrote: >> >> I think that companies with /8's and multiple unjustified /16's should >have >> to provide supporting documentation to keep them. > >This is a tough issue that we have often come back to. Unfortunately, we >have yet to come up with a good answer... > >Alec > >-- >Alec H. Peterson - ahp at hilander.com >Staff Scientist >CenterGate Research Group - http://www.centergate.com >"Technology so advanced, even _we_ don't understand it!" -- Justin W. Newton Senior Director, Networking and Telecommunications NetZero, Inc.
- Previous message: ARIN Justified...
- Next message: ARIN Justified...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the VWP mailing list