ARIN Justified...
Scott Rogers
SRogers at Affinity.com
Sun Jan 7 18:41:33 EST 2001
- Previous message: ARIN Justified...
- Next message: ARIN Justified...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
OK, It appears I've been unber a misconception. To my defense, it's been over a year since I did anything directly with the search engines. The good news (for me) is that I now have more ammunition to deny IP addresses to my customers, since they were using the "search engines don't support it" excuse. I understand that SSL (may) still be a valid reason for individual addresses. Am I wrong here? (Anyone). As far as I'm concernded, if they (my customers) get their IP addresses blocked, then they are either doing something they are not supposed to be doing, or allowing their customers to do things they shouldn't be doing. I'd rather have to give them a second IP when they get one blocked, and have them go through the hassle of re-numbering everthing, than give them a block of IP's (they they will just get blocked anyway). It might even discourage them from letting their IP's be used for SPAM, DoS, etc if they have to keep renumbering and changing the DNS for everything, everytime they do something stupid. As the Decicated Server/Colocation facility, I do bandwidth accounting by Switch Port (bytes based), not IP addresses. My customers seem to be happy with Web reporting (WebTrends) to breack it down from there. This does include FTP, but not streaming audio. They will have to figure that out themselves. So, as a hosting company, what other valid reasons are left for multiple "real" IP's, other than SSL ? BTW: Thanks for letting me vent here and there, as well as correcting some of my mis-conceptions on the search engines. Now maybe I won't sound so much like the high and mighty fool :-) -----Original Message----- From: Joe DeCosta To: Scott Rogers Cc: 'Jawaid.Bazyar at foreThought.net '; ''Leonard Gilbert ' '; '''Simon ' ' '; ''vwp at arin.net ' ' Sent: 1/7/01 1:05 PM Subject: Re: ARIN Justified... I'm pretty sure that Yahoo! and google, do, because all of our VHosted sites appear on their directories. Scott Rogers wrote: > OK, I've heard of two search engines now that > support http/1.1 name based virtual web sites. > > AltaVista and Excite. > > I have a feeling this is recent (last 6 months). > This is good news to me. Now, does anyone know > about YAHOO, LYCOS, MSN (go, google, snap, whatever)? > > WHat are the other "major" search engines? > > --
- Previous message: ARIN Justified...
- Next message: ARIN Justified...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the VWP mailing list