Policy Proposal 2001-3
Alec H. Peterson
ahp at hilander.com
Wed Sep 26 15:38:13 EDT 2001
- Previous message: Policy Proposal 2001-3
- Next message: Policy Proposal 2001-3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Bush" <randy at psg.com> To: "Alec H. Peterson" <ahp at hilander.com> Cc: <v6wg at arin.net>; <ppml at arin.net> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 13:11 Subject: Re: Policy Proposal 2001-3 > > > gTLD servers have always been part of all of the proposals. > > if having servers in 'special' space has yet to be shown to improve use, > why is not not appropriate to treat them just as we do all others? they > can get routable space from theu upstreams or justify space if their needs > are large enough. What do you mean by use? The whole idea behind the micro-allocations from the beginning was the notion that some pieces of infrastructure: a) Really do need their own PI blocks b) don't consume enough IP addresses to meet standard requirements. The goal was to put guidelines around which infrastructure met these requirements. Alec
- Previous message: Policy Proposal 2001-3
- Next message: Policy Proposal 2001-3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the V6WG mailing list