Policy Proposal 2001-3
Alec H. Peterson
ahp at hilander.com
Wed Sep 26 14:09:57 EDT 2001
- Previous message: Policy Proposal 2001-3
- Next message: Policy Proposal 2001-3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- From: "Randy Bush" <randy at psg.com> To: "Alec H. Peterson" <ahp at hilander.com> Cc: <v6wg at arin.net>; <ppml at arin.net> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 12:03 Subject: Re: Policy Proposal 2001-3 > > and how is it infeasible now? you may want to look at the address space the > roots and gtlds are in now before answering. Are you suggesting that new gTLD servers are never going to be deployed, or that existing ones will not change? > > and how does being multi-homed mean that one will not time out on the server > if the deamon is dead but the box is up and reachable? It doesn't. However, ARIN cannot address issues of operator error on a server. If you would like ARIN to be able to do this, I suggest you lobby the AC. > > and do note that the long timeout is not relevant if the box is not > reachable. True, but if the appropriate internet connection is down then it is very relevant, and I see the type of errors you describe above as being relatively few. > > the golden space snake oil has been available to roots for some years. how > many use it? perhaps root operators have actually studied the issues and > voted with their feet? *shrug*, perhaps. I'd like to see your data on this instead changing a ratified AC proposal based on your straw-man. Alec
- Previous message: Policy Proposal 2001-3
- Next message: Policy Proposal 2001-3
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the V6WG mailing list