[ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoFRe: NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
Joe Maimon
jmaimon at chl.com
Fri Mar 7 12:42:23 EST 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoFRe: NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Next message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoFRe: NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Leo Bicknell wrote: > In a message written on Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 07:56:30AM -0800, David Conrad wrote: > >>If IPv4 post free pool exhaustion demand is a reasonable percentage of >>current demand and there is no way for that demand to be met through >>transfers, do you still posit a black market would be insignificant? > > > Yes. > > How does an ISP tell the difference between a hijacked route (even > accidently, think YouTube recently) and a route for a resource sold by > YouTube on the black market? > > The answer is, they don't. ISP's today check whois and ask for > LOA's to route space because they know without doing it hijacking > may be more widespread and affect their customers. Why wouldnt you receive a LOA as part of your black market transaction?
- Previous message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoFRe: NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Next message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoFRe: NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list