[ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
David Conrad
drc at virtualized.org
Fri Mar 7 11:11:48 EST 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Next message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Joe, On Mar 7, 2008, at 6:16 AM, Joe Maimon wrote: > This would actually be a best case scenario, where access to ipv4 > internet is through ipv4 nat, but ipv6 is end-to-end. While I might agree, the tricky bit is having IPv6 end-to-end. This is obviously neither plentiful nor cheap at this point in time and if ISPs aren't paying attention to longer term realities of IPv4 exhaustion, this won't change. > The situation for content providers is likely a bit more problematic > than for ISP's. Yep. I imagine it is hard for content providers to make the business case to even look at IPv6 right now. And if content isn't available over IPv6, few ISP customers will ask for it, making it hard for ISPs to make their business case. And around we go. Regards, -drc
- Previous message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Next message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list