[ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
Tom Vest
tvest at pch.net
Thu Mar 6 16:55:21 EST 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Next message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Mar 6, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Geoff Huston wrote: > Tony Li wrote: >> >> |It is probably worthwhile remembering that (at least in the ARIN >> case) >> |we're talking about life after the exhaustion of the IANA IPv4 free >> |pool. The definition of "hoarding" will likely be subject to some >> |debate. >> | >> |For example, there is a well known university sitting on a /8. Is >> |that hoarding? >> >> >> Of course not. But say if Warren Buffet decided to buy up every >> prefix, >> drive up prices and then dole them out with an eye dropper, that >> would >> distort the market. > > And drive the industry to IPv6 deployment. > > Geoff I think we all wish this is how things will go. But it could just as easily go the other way, and either vector could easily be pre-empted by major unwelcome surprises. Randy's very educational demonstrations have revealed that there's a long way to go before anything is 100% certain. In the mean time, new entrants are not going to be the ones to pioneer this effort, because they'd still have to wait for the big guys to get their act together in order to be able to benefit much from entering the business. So if anyone is to lead, it will be the big guys. Do we believe that they're holding out until they know they can monetize their future IPv4 surplus assets? Do we believe that they're simply unable to afford the transition unless they can extract large sums from the IPv4 trade? Who is going to provide those sums, if not other big operators? Or do we think that adding a seven digit number to the cost of starting up will fill the gap without sparking internal rebellions and external interventions? One could also say that OPEC and increasing "real" oil scarcity is leading to the adoption of hydrogen fuel cell technology. In fact one could have said that back in the early 1970s too; we could still be saying in 20-30 years from now. Burning bridges behind you when the future is still uncertain just doesn't seem like prudent planning to me... TV
- Previous message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Next message: [ppml] NANOG IPv4 Exhaustion BoF
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list