[ppml] ***POSSIBLE SPAM*** Re: /29 limit for ARIN SWIP whois
Martin Hannigan
martin.hannigan at batelnet.bs
Tue Jan 15 18:18:47 EST 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] /29 limit for ARIN SWIP whois
- Next message: [ppml] ***POSSIBLE SPAM*** Re: /29 limit for ARIN SWIP whois
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- From: Dean Anderson <dean at av8.com> To: "Divins, David" <dsd at servervault.com> Cc: ppml at arin.net Subject: Re: [ppml] ***POSSIBLE SPAM*** Re: /29 limit for ARIN SWIP whois Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:51:27 -0500 (EST) > I've always been dubious of the need for SWIP. At best, > its a great way to find the customers of your competitors. > At worst, for your competitors to find your customers. > While I'm not against SWIP as an optional service for > those who _want_ to provide such information, I'm against > it as a requirement. > > I don't see any need for ARIN to require SWIP. While ARIN > may have a legitimate interest in this information to > establish usage for further allocation, that information > really should be kept strictly confidential--not even > board members should see it. In contrast, SWIP is public. You could always propose a policy to do away with SWIP. > BTW, Legacy block's don't have to comply with the RSA. "No > SWIP" is just one of the many rights that one loses under > the Legacy RSA. Don't sign the Legacy RSA. Contact me, > instead. What will that get them? -M<
- Previous message: [ppml] /29 limit for ARIN SWIP whois
- Next message: [ppml] ***POSSIBLE SPAM*** Re: /29 limit for ARIN SWIP whois
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list