[ppml] /29 limit for ARIN SWIP whois
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Wed Jan 9 03:40:58 EST 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] /29 limit for ARIN SWIP whois
- Next message: [ppml] /29 limit for ARIN SWIP whois
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> That's the morally bankrupt result of the #2 camp logic. > So please, let's ignore their input on SWIP policy. Did you, by chance, read the sentence where David said: My position is if I provide valid technical and abuse contac for an address space, the specific end- entity it is in use by and their physical address is irrelevant. Is it bad for David to take full responsibility for traffic emanating from his address space? > For the rest of us who have a modicum of responsibility, in the > #1 camp, clearly SWIPS aren't doing the job. I will point out that > they aren't even doing the job for the RIR. If they were, then > the RIR would not allow people to submit spreadsheets and such > as evidence of utilization. I agree. SWIP (Shared WHOIS Information Project) is broken. WHOIS itself is broken. RWHOIS (Remote WHOIS) is broken. In the past, I have proposed a step to fix this problem but I see no proposal from you. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] /29 limit for ARIN SWIP whois
- Next message: [ppml] /29 limit for ARIN SWIP whois
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list