[ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
michael.dillon at bt.com
michael.dillon at bt.com
Fri Feb 29 13:25:02 EST 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> There are a few different ways to deal with this, in addition > to the proposed transfer policy's conditions or a > transferee-restrictions-only system. For example, we might > ask ARIN to monitor market prices, and allow as many bits of > deaggregation (on transferor pre-qualifications) as needed to > keep supply and demand in balance across the range of address sizes... If ARIN does decide to monitor this particular derivatives market and take actions to regulate that market, are there any implications of that within the law? For instance, would ARIN have to be licenced or registered with the SEC? It would be interesting to hear from someone with financial markets expertise to see what is the likelihood that these IP address blocks would be considered to be some kind of exotic equity derivative. After all, if IP address blocks are being bought and sold, they have an equity value and the contracts that are sold would be equity derivatives. And since holders of these contracts can profit by selling them, then they are securities and therefore under the regulatory gaze of the SEC. --Michael Dillon
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list