[ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
Martin Hannigan
martin.hannigan at batelnet.bs
Wed Feb 27 23:59:43 EST 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Darte" <BillD at cait.wustl.edu> To: "Randy Bush" <randy at psg.com> Cc: ppml at arin.net Subject: Re: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:55:58 -0600 > Ah, but the role of the AC is not now, nor has it ever > been limited to process shepherding. > > bd > Hi Bill! The AC should not be undervalued. Still, I think that the AC, as a whole, should reconsider putting forth policy. Bottom up policy shouldn't come from the middle. Thanks, -M<
- Previous message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal 2008-2: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list