[ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal

[ scott told me off list that he will not be at nanog.  shame, as this
   would make a good ad hoc bof ]

i think the six month thing is five levels indirect from the goal, route 
conservation, you say you want to achieve.  hence it will have far less 
effect on the goal and many undesirable side effects and cause much 
faking to get around it.  complexity is rarely actually except as a 
barrier to competition (which is why the telephants got into the sick 
mind-set that it is a good thing).

i think the restriction on inter-region is un-needed and not useful.  if 
it won't work operationally for the rirs, then they will handle that at 
the admin/ops level; it is not a matter of *policy*.  and putting it in 
now will just mean we will have to go through policy process hoops later 
to take it back out.

randy