[ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
David Kessens
david.kessens at nsn.com
Tue Feb 12 16:49:34 EST 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] [sig-policy] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Raul, On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 08:31:34PM -0300, Raul Echeberria wrote: > > One observation. > > Accepting transfers only within the region is a > way to keep the IP addresses within the regions > in which they were originally allocated. > I don't know if it is good or not, but a fact. I would formulate this slightly different: Accepting transfers within the region is a way to keep the IP addresses *registered* within the same region. When the problems are big enough, people will find ways around arbritrary and restrictive procedures that are designed to keep addresses within a certain region. In addition, liquidity is key to providing a viable and vibrant marketplace. Barriers to this usually only benefit people in the arbitrage business in addition to larger corporations that have a much easier time to operate across borders. David Kessens ---
- Previous message: [ppml] [sig-policy] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: IPv4 Transfer Policy Proposal
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list