[ppml] Policy Proposal: Loophole Closure for 2007-21
Member Services
info at arin.net
Mon Feb 11 10:58:40 EST 2008
- Previous message: [ppml] "Who's afraid of IPv4 address depletion? Apparently no one."
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Community Networks IPv6 Allocation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
ARIN received the following policy proposal. In accordance with the ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process, the proposal is being posted to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (PPML) and being placed on ARIN's website. The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) will review this proposal at their next regularly scheduled meeting. The AC may decide to: 1. Accept the proposal as written. If the AC accepts the proposal, it will be posted as a formal policy proposal to PPML and it will be presented at a Public Policy Meeting. 2. Not accept the proposal. If the AC does not accept the proposal, the AC will explain their decision via the PPML. If a proposal is not accepted, then the author may elect to use the petition process to advance their proposal. If the author elects not to petition or the petition fails, then the proposal will be closed. The AC shepherds for this proposal are Owen DeLong and Suzanne Woolf. The AC invites everyone to comment on this proposal on the PPML, particularly their support or non-support and the reasoning behind their opinion. Such participation contributes to a thorough vetting and provides important guidance to the AC in their deliberations. The ARIN Internet Resource Policy Evaluation Process can be found at: http://www.arin.net/policy/irpep.html Mailing list subscription information can be found at: http://www.arin.net/mailing_lists/ Regards, Member Services American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN) ## * ## Policy Proposal Name: Loophole Closure for 2007-21 Author: Scott Leibrand, Owen DeLong Proposal Version: 1.0 Submission Date: 2008-02-07 Proposal type: modify Policy term: permanent Policy statement: Modify NRPM section 6.5.8.1 (Direct assignments from ARIN to end-user organizations: Criteria), to read: To qualify for a direct assignment, an organization must: 1. not be an IPv6 LIR; and 2. qualify for an IPv4 assignment or allocation from ARIN under the IPv4 policy currently in effect, or demonstrate efficient utilization of all direct IPv4 assignments and allocations, each of which must be covered by a current ARIN RSA. Rationale: The adopted wording of 2007-21 created a loophole allowing a resource holder to qualify under the policy with only one resource subject to RSA. This small change would close that loophole and bring policy in line with the original intent of the author. Timetable for implementation: immediate
- Previous message: [ppml] "Who's afraid of IPv4 address depletion? Apparently no one."
- Next message: [ppml] Policy Proposal: Community Networks IPv6 Allocation
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the PPML mailing list